Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1990;82:244-260

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Witkowski, F. X.
Right arrow Articles by Plonsey, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Witkowski, F. X.
Right arrow Articles by Plonsey, R.

Circulation, Vol 82, 244-260, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC- coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings

FX Witkowski, PA Penkoske and R Plonsey
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta School of Medicine, Edmonton, Canada.

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator has been shown to dramatically improve survival. The future refinement of these devices requires a clear understanding of their mechanism of action. We performed the following study to test two hypotheses: 1) When defibrillation is successful, fibrillating activity must be annihilated in a critical mass of both ventricles; and 2) when defibrillation is unsuccessful, at least one area of the ventricular mass has been left fibrillating. Unipolar Ag/AgCl sintered electrodes were directly coupled from triangular arrays at 40 epicardial locations (total, 120 recording sites) that covered both right and left ventricular surfaces and were designed to measure the voltage gradient generated by the shock at each triangular array as well as the underlying myocardial electrical activity before and immediately after the shock. An algorithm was developed and tested that reliably scored whether a postshock activation was a continuation of the immediately previous fibrillating activity. This technique was applied to 203 defibrillation attempts in six open-chest dogs during electrically induced ventricular fibrillation. There were 139 successful defibrillation attempts and 64 unsuccessful attempts. Monophasic truncated exponential 10-msec defibrillation shocks (0.5-35 J) were delivered through an anodal patch on the right atrium and a cathodal patch on the left ventricular apex. In all cases of unsuccessful defibrillation, at least one ventricular site could be clearly identified that failed to be defibrillated. In cases of successful defibrillation two distinct patterns were observed: 1) complete annihilation of fibrillating activity at all sites or 2) nearly complete cessation of fibrillating activity with a single area of persistent fibrillation that subsequently self-extinguished within one to three activations. This single site in the second form of successful defibrillation was located in the region of minimum voltage gradient produced by the defibrillating waveform and was occasionally accompanied by dynamic encapsulation with refractory tissue as a result of a wavefront emanating from a region that had undergone successful defibrillation. These results support the hypothesis that a critical mass of myocardium must be affected for successful defibrillation and that unsuccessful defibrillation is always accompanied by residual fibrillating activity in at least one site. The results also demonstrate that the size of the critical mass required for successful defibrillation can be less than 100%.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Sims, K. L. Schoff, J. M. Loeb, and N. A. Wiegert
Regional gap junction inhibition increases defibrillation thresholds
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 5, 2003; 285(1): H10 - H16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. L. De Jongh, V. Ramanathan, B. K. Hoffmeister, and R. A. Malkin
Left ventricular geometry immediately following defibrillation: shock-induced relaxation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): H815 - H819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Yashima, Y.-H. Kim, S. Armin, T.-J. Wu, Y. Miyauchi, W. J. Mandel, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian
On the mechanism of the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation threshold
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): H249 - H255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
X. Qi, P. Varma, D. Newman, and P. Dorian
Gap Junction Blockers Decrease Defibrillation Thresholds Without Changes in Ventricular Refractoriness in Isolated Rabbit Hearts
Circulation, September 25, 2001; 104(13): 1544 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Chattipakorn, I. Banville, R. A. Gray, and R. E. Ideker
Mechanism of Ventricular Defibrillation for Near-Defibrillation Threshold Shocks: A Whole-Heart Optical Mapping Study in Swine
Circulation, September 11, 2001; 104(11): 1313 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. S Karagueuzian and P.-S. Chen
Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: Implications for fibrillation and defibrillation
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. M. Gillis, V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber
Mechanism of Ventricular Defibrillation : The Role of Tissue Geometry in the Changes in Transmembrane Potential in Patterned Myocyte Cultures
Circulation, May 23, 2000; 101(20): 2438 - 2445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. S. Cooper, V. J. Plumb, A. E. Epstein, G. N. Kay, and R. E. Ideker
Marked Reduction in Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds With Dual-Current Pathways and Sequential Shocks in Humans
Circulation, June 30, 1998; 97(25): 2527 - 2535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Sims, A. W. Miller, and M. R. Ujhelyi
Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): H1943 - H1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Chattipakorn, B. H. KenKnight, J. M. Rogers, R. G. Walker, G. P. Walcott, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Locally Propagated Activation Immediately After Internal Defibrillation
Circulation, April 14, 1998; 97(14): 1401 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. R. Ujhelyi, J. J. Sims, and A. W. Miller
High-dose lidocaine does not affect defibrillation efficacy: implications for defibrillation mechanisms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 1998; 274(4): H1113 - H1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, A. M. Gillis, and A. G. Kleber
Activation of Cardiac Tissue by Extracellular Electrical Shocks : Formation of `Secondary Sources' at Intercellular Clefts in Monolayers of Cultured Myocytes
Circ. Res., February 23, 1998; 82(3): 375 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. S. Cooper, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Internal Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation : Marked Reduction in Defibrillation Threshold With Dual Current Pathways
Circulation, October 21, 1997; 96(8): 2693 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. Coronel, T. Opthof, P. Taggart, J. Tytgat, and M. Veldkamp
Differential electrophysiology of repolarisation from clone to clinic
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 1997; 33(3): 503 - 517.
[PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Gray, G. Ayers, and J. Jalife
Video Imaging of Atrial Defibrillation in the Sheep Heart
Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 1038 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Sweeney, R. M. Gill, and P. R. Reid
Refractory Interval After Transcardiac Shocks During Ventricular Fibrillation
Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2947 - 2952.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
K. F. Kwaku and S. M. Dillon
Shock-Induced Depolarization of Refractory Myocardium Prevents Wave-Front Propagation in Defibrillation
Circ. Res., November 1, 1996; 79(5): 957 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Behrens, C. Li, P. Kirchhof, F. L. Fabritz, and M. R. Franz
Reduced Arrhythmogenicity of Biphasic Versus Monophasic T-Wave Shocks: Implications for Defibrillation Efficacy
Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1974 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. M. Gillis, V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber
Spatial Changes in Transmembrane Potential During Extracellular Electrical Shocks in Cultured Monolayers of Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Circ. Res., October 1, 1996; 79(4): 676 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
O. H. Tovar and J. L. Jones
Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms Reduce Shock-Induced Response Duration Dispersion Between Low and High Shock Intensities
Circ. Res., August 1, 1995; 77(2): 430 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Damle, N. S. Robinson, D.-Z. Ye, S. I. Roth, R. Greene, J. J. Goldberger, and A. H. Kadish
Electrical Activation During Ventricular Fibrillation in the Subacute and Chronic Phases of Healing Canine Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, August 1, 1995; 92(3): 535 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text]