Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1991;83:1247-1255

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dilsizian, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bonow, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dilsizian, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bonow, R. O.

Circulation, Vol 83, 1247-1255, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Thallium reinjection after stress-redistribution imaging. Does 24-hour delayed imaging after reinjection enhance detection of viable myocardium?

V Dilsizian, WR Smeltzer, NM Freedman, R Dextras and RO Bonow
Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. 20892.

BACKGROUND. Thallium reinjection immediately after conventional stress- redistribution imaging improves the detection of viable myocardium, as many myocardial regions with apparently "irreversible" thallium defects on standard 3-4-hour redistribution images manifest enhanced thallium uptake after reinjection. Because the 10-minute period between reinjection and imaging may be too short, the present study was designed to determine whether 24-hour imaging after thallium reinjection provides additional information regarding myocardial viability beyond that obtained by imaging shortly after reinjection. METHODS AND RESULTS. We studied 50 patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease undergoing exercise thallium tomography, radionuclide angiography, and coronary arteriography. Immediately after the 3-4-hour redistribution images were obtained, 1 mCi thallium was injected at rest, and images were reacquired at 10 minutes and 24 hours after reinjection. The stress, redistribution, reinjection, and 24-hour images were then analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Of the 127 abnormal myocardial regions on the stress images, 55 had persistent defects on redistribution images by qualitative analysis, of which 25 (45%) demonstrated improved thallium uptake after reinjection. At the 24-hour study, 23 of the 25 regions (92%) with previously improved thallium uptake by reinjection showed no further improvement. Similarly, of the 30 regions determined to have irreversible defects after reinjection, 29 (97%) remained irreversible on 24-hour images. These findings were confirmed by the quantitative analysis. The mean normalized thallium activity in regions with enhanced thallium activity after reinjection increased from 57 +/- 13% on redistribution studies to 70 +/- 14% after reinjection but did not change at 24 hours (71 +/- 14%). In regions with irreversible defects that were unaltered by reinjection, mean regional thallium activity did not differ from the reinjection to the 24-hour studies (57 +/- 17% and 58 +/- 17%, respectively). Twenty-four-hour imaging after reinjection showed improvement in only four of 35 irreversible regions (involving three of the 50 patients). CONCLUSIONS. These data indicate that thallium reinjection at rest after 3-4 hours of redistribution provides most of the clinically relevant information pertaining to myocardial viability in regions with apparently irreversible thallium defects. Hence, thallium reinjection may be used instead of 24-hour imaging in most patients in whom a persistent thallium defect is observed on conventional redistribution images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
V. Go, M. R. Bhatt, and R. C. Hendel
The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of ECG-Gated SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 912 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. D. Mule, J. J. Bax, B. Zingone, F. Martinelli, C. Burelli, A. Stefania, L. DiSipio, and G. Soravia
The beneficial effect of revascularization on jeopardized myocardium: reverse remodeling and improved long-term prognosis
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 22(3): 426 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Jadvar, H. W. Strauss, and G. M. Segall
SPECT and PET in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 915 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. W. Morse, S. Noe, J. Caravalho Jr., A. Balingit, and A. J. Taylor
Rest-Redistribution 201Tl Single-Photon Emission CT Imaging for Determination of Myocardial Viability: Relationship Among Viability, Mode of Therapy, and Long-term Prognosis
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1621 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M.G. Niemeyer, A.F.M. Kuijper, J.G. Meeder, M.J.M. Cramer, A.J.M. Cleophas, E.E. van der Wall, and M. G. Niemeyer
Comparison of Thallium Scintigraphy and Positron Emission Tomography
Angiology, October 1, 1997; 48(10): 843 - 853.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. A. Beller
Comparison of 201Tl Scintigraphy and Low-Dose Dobutamine Echocardiography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Viability
Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2681 - 2684.
[Full Text]