This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bush, T. L. Articles by Riedel, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bush, T. L. Articles by Riedel, D.

Circulation, Vol 83, 1287-1293, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Screening for total cholesterol. Do the National Cholesterol Education Program's recommendations detect individuals at high risk of coronary heart disease?

TL Bush and D Riedel
Department of Epidemiology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md 21205.

BACKGROUND. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) has provided guidelines for identification of persons at high risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) because of lipid abnormalities. These recommendations are based on total cholesterol as the initial screening tool and have become the stimulus for clinic- and community-based screening programs nationwide. However, the use of the guidelines may be problematic because individuals may have total cholesterol levels in the desirable range but low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels considered at high risk. This study evaluates the ability of the NCEP screening recommendations to identify correctly persons at high risk of CHD because of lipid abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS. Using the NCEP guidelines, we simulated a population-based screening program with data from visits 1 and 2 of the Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. Individuals were considered to be at high risk of CHD if they had LDL levels greater than 160 mg/dl or HDL levels less than 35 mg/dl. Following the NCEP process, 21% of those with high LDL concentrations and 66% of those with low HDL concentrations would not be routinely referred for immediate treatment. Overall, 41% of those at high risk of CHD would not be promptly evaluated. The sensitivity of the guidelines for promptly identifying individuals with lipoprotein abnormalities is 59%. CONCLUSIONS. This relatively low sensitivity of total cholesterol as a screening tool should be the impetus for rethinking the screening guidelines. Specifically, the cost-benefit ratio of routine screening for lipoproteins, particularly HDL cholesterol, needs to be carefully considered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Burchfiel, A. Laws, R. Benfante, R. J. Goldberg, L.-J. Hwang, D. Chiu, B. L. Rodriguez, J. D. Curb, and D. S. Sharp Combined Effects of HDL Cholesterol, Triglyceride, and Total Cholesterol Concentrations on 18-Year Risk of Atherosclerotic Disease Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1430 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. A. Grover, L. Coupal, and X.-P. Hu Identifying Adults at Increased Risk of Coronary Disease: How Well Do the Current Cholesterol Guidelines Work? JAMA, September 13, 1995; 274(10): 801 - 806. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Grover, C. S. Palmer, and L. Coupal Serum Lipid Screening to Identify High-Risk Individuals for Coronary Death: The Results of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Cohort Arch Intern Med, March 28, 1994; 154(6): 679 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Bass, C. J. Newschaffer, M. J. Klag, and T. L. Bush Plasma Lipoprotein Levels as Predictors of Cardiovascular Death in Women Arch Intern Med, October 11, 1993; 153(19): 2209 - 2216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Gwynne Measuring and Knowing: The Trouble With Cholesterol and Decision Making JAMA, September 25, 1991; 266(12): 1696 - 1698. [Abstract] [PDF]

				NCEP CHOLESTEROL-SCREENING GUIDELINES MISS MANY HIGH- RISK PATIENTS Journal Watch (General), April 19, 1991; 1991(419): 4 - 4. [Full Text]