This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schoels, W. Articles by el-Sherif, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schoels, W. Articles by el-Sherif, N.

Circulation, Vol 83, 1716-1730, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Circus movement atrial flutter in canine sterile pericarditis model. Activation patterns during entrainment and termination of single-loop reentry in vivo

W Schoels, M Restivo, EB Caref, WB Gough and N el-Sherif
Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Brooklyn.

BACKGROUND. Recently, we used a custom designed "jacket" electrode with 127 bipolar electrodes in a flexible nylon matrix to map the total atrial epicardial surface in the in situ canine heart. Atrial flutter in dogs with sterile pericarditis was shown to be due to a single wave front circulating around a combined functional/anatomic obstacle, with the arc of functional conduction block contiguous with one or more of the atrial vessels. METHODS AND RESULTS. In the present study, this model was used to analyze the activation pattern during pacing-induced entrainment and termination of single reentrant loops in a syncytium without anatomically predetermined pathways. Sustained atrial flutter was induced in five dogs with 3-5-day-old sterile pericarditis. Atrial pacing at a cycle length 5-30 msec shorter than the spontaneous cycle length entrained the arrhythmia and could result in a "classical" activation pattern, characterized by an antidromic stimulated wave that collided with the reentrant orthodromic wave front of the previous beat at a constant site. However, two variations of this classical activation pattern were also observed: 1) Pacing at short cycle lengths could lead to localized conduction block in antidromic direction, forcing a change in the pathway of the antidromic wave front. This could prevent the expected shift of the site of collision in antidromic direction. 2) The stimulated orthodromic wave front could also use a pathway different from that of the original reentrant impulse, so that a different circuit was active during the pacing period. Termination of atrial flutter by rapid atrial stimulation was associated with progressive slowing and finally blocking of the paced orthodromic wave front and a progressive shift of the site of collision in antidromic direction. The occurrence of conduction block was determined by the cycle length of stimulation and the number of stimulated beats. A longer train at the critical cycle length or the critical number of beats at a shorter cycle length could reinduce the same reentrant circuit or a different reentrant circuit, respectively, during stimulated cycles following the beat that terminated reentry. CONCLUSIONS. The epicardial activation sequence during entrainment of reentrant arrhythmias does not necessarily follow a standard activation pattern. Instead, the stimulated orthodromic as well as the antidromic wave front might use a pathway different from that of the original reentrant wave front. The mechanisms of termination, failure of termination, and reinitiation of single-loop reentry are similar to those in the "figure-eight" reentrant circuit.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. L. Waldo Mechanisms of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation: distinct entities or two sides of a coin? Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 217 - 229. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Becker, A. Bauer, S. Metz, R. Kinscherf, J. C. Senges, K. D. Schreiner, F. Voss, W. Kuebler, and W. Schoels Intercaval Block in Normal Canine Hearts : Role of the Terminal Crest Circulation, May 22, 2001; 103(20): 2521 - 2526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Becker, R. Klinkott, A. Bauer, J. C. Senges, K. D. Schreiner, F. Voss, W. Kuebler, and W. Schoels Multisite pacing for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias: potential mechanisms J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1939 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Schumacher, W. Jung, H. Schmidt, C. Fischenbeck, T. Lewalter, A. Hagendorff, H. Omran, C. Wolpert, and B. Luderitz Transverse conduction capabilities of the crista terminalis in patients with atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Schmitt, B. Zrenner, M. Schneider, M. Karch, G. Ndrepepa, I. Deisenhofer, S. Weyerbrock, J. Schreieck, and A. Schomig Clinical Experience With a Novel Multielectrode Basket Catheter in Right Atrial Tachycardias Circulation, May 11, 1999; 99(18): 2414 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D Freigang, A. Bauer, R. Becker, J. C Senges, P. Kraft, J. Brachmann, W. Kubler, and W. Schoels Differential effects of d-sotalol on normal and infarcted myocardium: an experimental study using epicardial mapping Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1997; 35(1): 52 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T.S. Konings, J. L.R.M. Smeets, O. C. Penn, H. J.J. Wellens, and M. A. Allessie Configuration of Unipolar Atrial Electrograms During Electrically Induced Atrial Fibrillation in Humans Circulation, March 4, 1997; 95(5): 1231 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. Philippon, V. J. Plumb, A. E. Epstein, and G. N. Kay The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Following Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter Circulation, August 1, 1995; 92(3): 430 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text]