Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1991;83:2057-2066

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sweeney, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, P. R.

Circulation, Vol 83, 2057-2066, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Characterization of refractory period extension by transcardiac shock

RJ Sweeney, RM Gill and PR Reid
Department of Electrophysiology Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind.

BACKGROUND. To better understand the refractory period extension (RPE) produced by transcardiac shocks and its possible role in defibrillation, we measured RPE under various experimental conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS. Using ventricular pacing in pentobarbital- anesthetized dogs, we characterized RPE in relation to the anatomic site of pacing, the local voltage gradient (LVG) produced by the shocks at the pacing site, and the pacing rate and pacing current used to make the measurements. We also determined if RPE persisted into the next refractory period after the shock and measured RPE at the end of 30- second episodes of acute ischemia to the pacing site, which were caused by occluding the left anterior descending artery. Each anatomic site tested showed RPE, which increased sharply with increasing LVG at lower levels but less sharply at higher LVG. The RPE versus LVG was approximated with an exponential curve that had an exponential constant of about 5-6 V/cm. At faster pacing rates, RPE occurred earlier in the refractory period but was unchanged when expressed as a percent increase of refractory period. RPE did not vary with the pacing current and was present only in the refractory period during which the shock was delivered. The RPE was not significantly altered by acute ischemia. These results show that transcardiac shocks selectively extend the refractory period of tissue proportional to the LVG and the timing of the shock in the refractory period. They are consistent with the concept that RPE prevents depolarization from tissue directly excited by a shock from propagating to tissue that was refractory to that same shock. CONCLUSIONS. The insensitivity of RPE to short ischemic episodes and the presence of RPE at increased activation rates suggest that RPE might exist under conditions of fibrillation and be a major determinant of the success or failure of defibrillation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. R. Ujhelyi, J. J. Sims, and A. W. Miller
Induction of Electrical Heterogeneity Impairs Ventricular Defibrillation : An Effect Specific to Regional Conduction Velocity Slowing
Circulation, December 21, 1999; 100(25): 2534 - 2540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. Banville, R. A. Gray, R. E. Ideker, and W. M. Smith
Shock-Induced Figure<$DOWNLINK>-of-Eight Reentry in the Isolated Rabbit Heart
Circ. Res., October 15, 1999; 85(8): 742 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. S. Strobel, B. H. KenKnight, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Sims, A. W. Miller, and M. R. Ujhelyi
Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): H1943 - H1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. R. Efimov, Y. Cheng, D. R. Van Wagoner, T. Mazgalev, and P. J. Tchou
Virtual Electrode–Induced Phase Singularity : A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure
Circ. Res., May 4, 1998; 82(8): 918 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Chattipakorn, B. H. KenKnight, J. M. Rogers, R. G. Walker, G. P. Walcott, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Locally Propagated Activation Immediately After Internal Defibrillation
Circulation, April 14, 1998; 97(14): 1401 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Sweeney, R. M. Gill, and P. R. Reid
Refractory Interval After Transcardiac Shocks During Ventricular Fibrillation
Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2947 - 2952.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. M. Gillis, V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber
Spatial Changes in Transmembrane Potential During Extracellular Electrical Shocks in Cultured Monolayers of Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Circ. Res., October 1, 1996; 79(4): 676 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text]