Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1991;84:1783-1795

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischell, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischell, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R. J.

Circulation, Vol 84, 1783-1795, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Ultrasonic energy. Effects on vascular function and integrity

TA Fischell, MA Abbas, GW Grant and RJ Siegel
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305.

BACKGROUND. Ultrasonic energy transmitted via flexible wire probes provides a new means of ablating atherosclerotic plaque. We studied the effects of ultrasonic energy (20 kHz) delivered via a ball-tipped wire probe on arterial vasomotor behavior in rabbit thoracic aortas in a perfused whole-vessel model. METHODS AND RESULTS. After precontraction with phenylephrine (10(-5) M) or KCl (60 mM), the effects of ultrasonic energy (0.7-5.5 W x 60 seconds, 42-330 J) on arterial vasomotor behavior were measured using long-axis ultrasonic vessel imaging of the proximal (ultrasonic probe-treated) and distal (untreated) control segments. The efficacy of plaque ablation at these same probe-tip power outputs was evaluated in atherosclerotic, human cadaver iliofemoral arteries. Ultrasonic energy caused dose (energy)-dependent relaxation in rabbit aortas after precontraction with phenylephrine in arteries with endothelium (n = 8) and without endothelium (n = 8) (p less than 0.001 versus ultrasound treated at power outputs of 2.9 and 5.5 W). There was no difference in the relaxation dose responses between endothelialized and endothelially denuded segments (p = NS). Ultrasonic energy also caused significant relaxation (67 +/- 8%) after voltage- dependent precontraction with 60 mM KCl. Temperature measurements revealed less than 1 degrees C warming of the vessel wall during as long as 2 minutes of treatment at a power output of 5.5 W. Pathological examination showed no smooth muscle injury at (moderate) power outputs that caused arterial relaxation. At probe-tip power outputs of 2.9-5.5 W, ultrasonic energy recanalized two of two totally occluded cadaveric iliofemoral vessel segments. The ultrasonic ablation catheter was also demonstrated to cause arterial relaxation in a recanalized canine femoral artery in vivo. CONCLUSIONS. Ultrasonic energy delivered via a flexible-wire probe produces dose-dependent, endothelium-independent smooth muscle relaxation capable of reversing both receptor-mediated and voltage-dependent vasoconstriction in vitro. At moderate power outputs, this relaxation response does not appear to be due to thermal effects or irreversible smooth muscle cell injury. This vasorelaxant effect of ultrasonic energy is also apparent in vivo, at doses that effectively ablate atherosclerotic plaque, and may improve the safety of arterial recanalization using ultrasonic energy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. Iida, H. Luo, K. Hagisawa, T. Akima, P. K. Shah, T. Z. Naqvi, and R. J. Siegel
Noninvasive Low-Frequency Ultrasound Energy Causes Vasodilation in Humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 532 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Siegel, V. N. Suchkova, T. Miyamoto, H. Luo, R. B. Baggs, Y. Neuman, M. Horzewski, V. Suorsa, S. Kobal, T. Thompson, et al.
Ultrasound energy improves myocardial perfusion in the presence of coronary occlusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1454 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Maruo, C. E. Hamner, A. J. Rodrigues, T. Higami, J. F. Greenleaf, and H. V. Schaff
Nitric oxide and prostacyclin in ultrasonic vasodilatation of the canine internal mammary artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 126 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Miyamoto, Y. Neuman, H. Luo, D.-S. Jeon, S. Kobal, F. Ikeno, M. Horzewski, Y. Honda, J. M. Mirocha, T. Iwami, et al.
Coronary vasodilation by noninvasive transcutaneous ultrasound: An in vivo canine study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1623 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. J. Fitzgerald, A. Takagi, M. P. Moore, M. Hayase, F. D. Kolodgie, D. Corl, M. Nassi, R. Virmani, and P. G. Yock
Intravascular Sonotherapy Decreases Neointimal Hyperplasia After Stent Implantation in Swine
Circulation, April 10, 2001; 103(14): 1828 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. G. Yock and P. J. Fitzgerald
Catheter-Based Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Shake, Rattle, and Reperfuse
Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1360 - 1362.
[Full Text]