This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miranda, C. P. Articles by Froelicher, V. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miranda, C. P. Articles by Froelicher, V. F.

Circulation, Vol 84, 2357-2365, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Post-myocardial infarction exercise testing. Non-Q wave versus Q wave correlation with coronary angiography and long-term prognosis

CP Miranda, WG Herbert, P Dubach, KG Lehmann and VF Froelicher
Cardiology Department, Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, Calif 90822.

BACKGROUND. The presence or absence of baseline diagnostic Q waves has been believed to compromise the accuracy of standard exercise electrocardiography in identifying severe coronary artery disease (three-vessel and/or left main disease); therefore, a retrospective analysis was performed using a personal computer data base of exercise test responses and cardiac catheterization results to evaluate this premise, and follow-up was performed to observe how Q waves and/or severe coronary disease impacted on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS. Two hundred fifty-three male patients who had survived a myocardial infarction were studied. Patients on digitalis, those with left bundle branch block or left ventricular hypertrophy on their baseline electrocardiogram, those with previous revascularization procedures, and those with significant valvular or congenital heart disease were excluded. All patients performed either a low-level predischarge or a sign/symptom limited exercise test and underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 32 days of each test (range, 0-90 days). Long-term follow-up on patients was performed for an average of 45 months (+/- 17 months). Group NQMI comprised 103 post-myocardial infarction patients lacking Q waves at the time of exercise testing and group QMI comprised 150 patients who developed Q waves with their myocardial infarction. The cut points of greater than or equal to 1 mm (chi 2 = 14.39, p less than 0.001) and greater than or equal to 2 mm (chi 2 = 26.11, p less than 0.001) of exercise-induced ST segment depression were reliable markers of severe coronary disease in Q wave infarct survivors. This was also true for non-Q wave infarct survivors as greater than or equal to 1 mm (chi 2 = 6.02, p = 0.01) and greater than or equal to 2 mm (chi 2 = 4.37, p = 0.04) of ST segment depression were reliable markers of severe coronary disease. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that exercise-induced ST segment depression had discriminating power for the identification of severe coronary artery disease in both the Q wave myocardial infarction patients (area = 0.735, z = 4.47, p less than 0.001) and the non-Q wave infarct patients (area = 0.700, z = 3.20, p less than 0.001). After 4.4 years of cumulative follow-up, patients with severe coronary disease had an infarct-free survival rate of 72% (95%, CI, 50.0-86.0%), whereas those without severe disease had an 86% (95% CI, 76.5-91.5%) infarct-free survival rate (Cox chi 2 = 4.00, p = 0.045). Non-Q wave patients had an infarct-free survival rate of 81% (95% CI, 66.0-89.5%), whereas those with Q waves had an infarct-free survival rate of 85% (95% CI, 73.9- 91.3%) (Cox chi 2 = 0.0005, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS. The presence or absence of diagnostic Q waves has no significant effect on the ability of the exercise electrocardiogram to identify severe coronary artery disease in survivors of myocardial infarction. Long-term infarct-free survival of patients with myocardial infarction is more related to the presence of severe coronary disease rather than if they suffered a non- Q wave or Q wave infarction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J P Greenwood, J F Younger, J P Ridgway, M U Sivananthan, S G Ball, and S Plein Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1363 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Tavel Stress Testing in Cardiac Evaluation : Current Concepts With Emphasis on the ECG Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 907 - 925. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Dominguez, C Torp-Pedersen, L Koeber, and C Rask-Madsen Prognostic value of exercise testing in a cohort of patients followed for 15 years after acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2001; 22(4): 300 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]