This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miura, T. Articles by Iimura, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miura, T. Articles by Iimura, O.

Circulation, Vol 84, 2504-2512, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Does myocardial stunning contribute to infarct size limitation by ischemic preconditioning?

T Miura, M Goto, K Urabe, A Endoh, K Shimamoto and O Iimura
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical College, Japan.

BACKGROUND. The mechanism through which ischemic preconditioning causes cardioprotection is unknown. The present study investigated the role of stunning in preconditioning. METHODS AND RESULTS. We studied three different protocols of preconditioning: two cycles of 2-minute ischemia separated by 5-minute reperfusion (2'PC), one cycle of 5-minute ischemia by 5-minute reperfusion (5'PC1), and two cycles of 5-minute ischemia separated by 5-minute reperfusion (5'PC2). In the first series of experiments, the stunning associated with 2'PC, 5'PC1, or 5'PC2 was assessed using an epicardial Doppler transducer in anesthetized open- chest rabbits. The thickening fraction (percent baseline) of the preconditioned region was 76.8 +/- 7.2% (mean +/- SEM) after 2'PC but 31.4 +/- 9.2% and 34.3 +/- 9.7% after 5'PC1 and 5'PC2, respectively, which were significantly lower, thus indicating more severe stunning than that after 2'PC. In the second series of experiments, a branch of the left circumflex artery was occluded for 30 minutes and then reperfused for 72 hours in four groups of rabbits. One group was not preconditioned and three groups were preconditioned with 2'PC, 5'PC1, or 5'PC2 protocols before the 30-minute ischemia. In contrast to the differences observed in the stunning in the first series of experiments, histological infarct size was similar in the three preconditioned groups (21.1 +/- 3.0% of area at risk after 2'PC, 20.1 +/- 3.4% after 5'PC1, 16.4 +/- 4.2% after 5'PC2), all of which were significantly smaller than that in the unpreconditioned group (43.9 +/- 5.0%). The third series of experiments examined the degree of stunning by 2'PC, 5'PC1, or 5'PC2 and the size of infarct (tetrazolium staining) in the same animal after 30-minute ischemia/3-hour reperfusion; again, the results showed no significant correlation between degree of stunning and infarct size. CONCLUSIONS. The myocardial infarct size- limiting effect of preconditioning did not correlate with the degree of myocardial stunning accompanying preconditioning. Thus, it is unlikely that myocardial stunning contributes to the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Murphy and C. Steenbergen Mechanisms Underlying Acute Protection From Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 581 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Beguin, M. Joyeux-Faure, D. Godin-Ribuot, P. Levy, and C. Ribuot Acute intermittent hypoxia improves rat myocardium tolerance to ischemia J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 1064 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Kloner and R. B. Jennings Consequences of Brief Ischemia: Stunning, Preconditioning, and Their Clinical Implications: Part 2 Circulation, December 18, 2001; 104(25): 3158 - 3167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Kloner and R. B. Jennings Consequences of Brief Ischemia: Stunning, Preconditioning, and Their Clinical Implications: Part 1 Circulation, December 11, 2001; 104(24): 2981 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Miura, Y. Liu, M. Goto, A. Tsuchida, T. Miki, A. Nakano, Y. Nishino, Y. Ohnuma, and K. Shimamoto Mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ channels play a role in cardioprotection by Na+-H+ exchange inhibition against ischemia/reperfusion injury J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2001; 37(3): 957 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Matsubara, S. Minatoguchi, H. Matsuo, K. Hayakawa, T. Segawa, Y. Matsuno, S. Watanabe, M. Arai, Y. Uno, M. Kawasaki, et al. Three minute, but not one minute, ischemia and nicorandil have a preconditioning effect in patients with coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2000; 35(2): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M.J. Lamers Preconditioning and limitation of stunning: one step closer to the protected protein(s)? Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 1999; 42(3): 571 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Miura, T. Miura, S. Kawamura, M. Goto, J. Sakamoto, A. Tsuchida, M. Matsuzaki, and K. Shimamoto Effect of protein kinase C inhibitors on cardioprotection by ischemic preconditioning depends on the number of preconditioning episodes Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 1998; 37(3): 700 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Zellner, L. Hebbar, F. A. Crawford Jr, R. Mukherjee, and F. G. Spinale Beneficial Effects of Myocyte Preconditioning on Contractile Processes After Cardioplegic Arrest Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1996; 61(2): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Abd-Elfattah, M. Ding, and A. S. Wechsler INTERMITTENT AORTIC CROSSCLAMPING PREVENTS CUMULATIVE ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE DEPLETION, VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION, AND DYSFUNCTION (STUNNING): IS IT PRECONDITIONING? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1995; 110(2): 328 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text]