Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;85:1304-1310

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Furman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Furman, S.

Circulation, Vol 85, 1304-1310, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Influence of left ventricular function on outcome of patients treated with implantable defibrillators

SG Kim, JD Fisher, CW Choue, J Gross, J Roth, KJ Ferrick, R Brodman and S Furman
Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Moses Division, Bronx, NY 10467.

BACKGROUND. The outcomes of patients treated with implantable defibrillators were compared between patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30% and less than 30%. METHODS AND RESULTS. Of 68 consecutive patients treated with implantable defibrillators, 40 patients (group 1) had left ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30%, and 28 patients (group 2) had left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%. Sudden death, surgical mortality, nonsudden arrhythmia-related death (death within 24 hours after an arrhythmic event despite initial termination of the arrhythmia by the implantable defibrillator), total arrhythmia-related death (including sudden death, surgical death, and nonsudden arrhythmia- related death), and total cardiac death were compared between the two groups. Surgical mortality was 4.4% (0% in group 1, 11% in group 2). During the follow-up of 31 +/- 27 months, actuarial survival rates free of events were 97%, 97%, and 97% in group 1 and 96%, 91%, and 82% in group 2 at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, for sudden death (p = NS); 97%, 97%, and 97% in group 1 and 85%, 81%, and 72% in group 2 at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, for sudden death and surgical mortality (p less than 0.05); 97%, 97%, and 97% in group 1 and 82%, 78%, and 70% in group 2 at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, for total arrhythmia-related death (p less than 0.05); and 95%, 95%, and 95% in group 1 and 82%, 69%, and 57% in group 2 at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, for total cardiac death (p less than 0.05). Four (57%) of seven nonsudden cardiac deaths during the initial 36-month follow-up period were causally related to arrhythmia (three surgical deaths and one arrhythmia-related nonsudden death). CONCLUSIONS. The outcome of patients treated with implantable defibrillators is strongly influenced by the degree of left ventricular dysfunction. In group 1 patients, surgical mortality, sudden death, and total cardiac death are rare. In group 2, sudden death rate may not be markedly different from that of group 1 patients. However, the risk of therapy (surgical mortality) is high. Many nonsudden cardiac deaths are causally related to arrhythmia (surgical mortality or nonsudden arrhythmia-related death). Therefore, the survival rate free of total arrhythmia-related death is significantly lower in group 2 (70% versus 97% in group 1 at 3 years). Further studies are needed to determine the roles of defibrillator therapy and other therapies in various clinical settings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K.-H. Kuck and S. Nisam
ICD therapy: 'the sickest benefit the most...': what about the less sick?
Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 508 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. D. Fisher
Who Needs a Defibrillator?: The Beat Goes On
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2005; 46(9): 1727 - 1728.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Whang, M. A. Mittleman, D. Q. Rich, P. J. Wang, J. N. Ruskin, G. H. Tofler, J. E. Muller, C. M. Albert, and for the TOVA Investigators
Heart Failure and the Risk of Shocks in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Results From the Triggers Of Ventricular Arrhythmias (TOVA) Study
Circulation, March 23, 2004; 109(11): 1386 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. B. Mitchell, E. A. Pineda, J. L. Titus, P. M. Bartosch, and D. G. Benditt
Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: The importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Pacifico, L. L. Ferlic, F.e. R. Cedillo-Salazar, N. Nasir Jr, T. K. Doyle, and P. D. Henry
Shocks as predictors of survival in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1999; 34(1): 204 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Bocker, D. Bansch, A. Heinecke, M. Weber, J. Brunn, D. Hammel, M. Borggrefe, G. Breithardt, and M. Block
Potential Benefit From Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With and Without Heart Failure
Circulation, October 20, 1998; 98(16): 1636 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. E. Marchlinski
Predicting Arrhythmic Death : A Plea for Standardized Reporting Techniques and Data Based on Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring
Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1713 - 1716.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. C. Caruso, F. I. Marcus, E. A. Hahn, V. L. Hartz, and J. W. Mason
Predictors of Arrhythmic Death and Cardiac Arrest in the ESVEM Trial
Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1888 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Gioia, B. Bagheri, C. D. Gottlieb, D. S. Schwartzman, D. J. Callans, F. E. Marchlinski, J. Heo, and A. E. Iskandrian
Prediction of Outcome of Patients With Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias Treated With Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Using SPECT Perfusion Imaging
Circulation, January 21, 1997; 95(2): 390 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Villacastin, J. Almendral, A. Arenal, J. Albertos, J. Ormaetxe, R. Peinado, H. Bueno, J. L. Merino, A. Pastor, O. Medina, et al.
Incidence and Clinical Significance of Multiple Consecutive, Appropriate, High-Energy Discharges in Patients With Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Circulation, February 15, 1996; 93(4): 753 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
J. A. Reiffel
Data-driven Decisions: The Importance of Clinical Trials in Arrhythmia Management
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1996; 1(1): 79 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. O. Sweeney, J. N. Ruskin, H. Garan, B. A. McGovern, M. L. Guy, D. F. Torchiana, G. J. Vlahakes, J. B. Newell, M. J. Semigran, and G. W. Dec
Influence of the Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator on Sudden Death and Total Mortality in Patients Evaluated for Cardiac Transplantation
Circulation, December 1, 1995; 92(11): 3273 - 3281.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. L. Mickleborough, H. Maruyama, Y. Takagi, S. Mohamed, Z. Sun, and L. Ebisuzaki
Results of Revascularization in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Circulation, November 1, 1995; 92(9): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Roden
Risks and Benefits of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 22, 1994; 331(12): 785 - 791.
[Full Text]