Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;85:1510-1523

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wharton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wharton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.

Circulation, Vol 85, 1510-1523, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation

JM Wharton, PD Wolf, WM Smith, PS Chen, DW Frazier, S Yabe, N Danieley and RE Ideker
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. 27710.

BACKGROUND. Potential gradient field determination may be a helpful means of describing the effects of defibrillation shocks; however, potential gradient field requirements for defibrillation with different electrode configurations have not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS. To evaluate the field requirements for defibrillation, potential fields during defibrillation shocks and the following ventricular activations were recorded with 74 epicardial electrodes in 12 open-chest dogs with the use of a computerized mapping system. Shock electrodes (2.64 cm2) were attached to the lateral right atrium (R), lateral left ventricular base (L), and left ventricular apex (V). Four electrode configurations were tested: single shocks of 14-msec duration given to two single anode-single cathode configurations, R:V and L:V, and to one dual anode-single cathode configuration, (R+L):V; and sequential 7-msec shocks separated by 1 msec given to R:V and L:V (R:V-- --L:V). Defibrillation threshold (DFT) current was significantly lower for R:V----L:V than for the other configurations and markedly higher for L:V. Despite these differences, the minimum potential gradients measured at DFT were not significantly different (approximately 6-7 V/cm for each electrode configuration). Potential gradient fields generated by the electrode configurations were markedly uneven, with a 15-27-fold change from lowest to highest gradient, with the greatest decrease in gradient occurring near the shock electrodes. Although gradient fields varied with the electrode configuration, all configurations produced weak fields along the right ventricular base. Early sites of epicardial activation after all unsuccessful shocks occurred in areas in which the field was weak; 87% occurred at sites with gradients less than 15 V/cm. Ventricular tachycardia originating in high gradient areas near shock electrodes followed 11 of 67 successful shocks. CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that 1) defibrillation fields created by small epicardial electrodes are very uneven; 2) achievement of a certain minimum potential gradient over both ventricles is necessary for ventricular defibrillation; 3) the difference in shock strengths required to achieve this minimum gradient over both ventricles may explain the differences in DFTs for various electrode configurations; and 4) high gradient areas in the uneven fields can induce ectopic activation after successful shocks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. B. Mitchell, E. A. Pineda, J. L. Titus, P. M. Bartosch, and D. G. Benditt
Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: The importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. G. Fast and E. R. Cheek
Optical Mapping of Arrhythmias Induced by Strong Electrical Shocks in Myocyte Cultures
Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 664 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. A. Mowrey, Y. Cheng, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 27 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Butter, E. Meisel, J. Tebbenjohanns, L. Engelmann, E. Fleck, B. Schubert, S. Hahn, and D. Pfeiffer
Transvenous Biventricular Defibrillation Halves Energy Requirements in Patients
Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2533 - 2538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. S Karagueuzian and P.-S. Chen
Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: Implications for fibrillation and defibrillation
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
X. Zheng, M. E. Benser, G. P. Walcott, S. D. Girouard, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Reduction of Atrial Defibrillation Threshold With an Interatrial Septal Electrode
Circulation, November 21, 2000; 102(21): 2659 - 2664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Winter, J. E. Heil, C. Schumann, Y. Lin, C. M. Schannwell, U. Michel, J. D. Schipke, H. D. Schulte, and E. Gams
Effect of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead placement in the right ventricle on defibrillation energy requirements. A combined experimental and clinical study
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 14(4): 419 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. S. Cooper, V. J. Plumb, A. E. Epstein, G. N. Kay, and R. E. Ideker
Marked Reduction in Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds With Dual-Current Pathways and Sequential Shocks in Humans
Circulation, June 30, 1998; 97(25): 2527 - 2535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, M. J. Niebauer, P. J. Tchou, and B. L. Wilkoff
Additional Lead Improves Defibrillation Efficacy With an Abdominal `Hot Can' Electrode System
Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4400 - 4407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Neunlist and L. Tung
Dose-dependent reduction of cardiac transmembrane potential by high-intensity electrical shocks
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2817 - H2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. S. Cooper, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Internal Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation : Marked Reduction in Defibrillation Threshold With Dual Current Pathways
Circulation, October 21, 1997; 96(8): 2693 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt
Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations
Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3082 - 3088.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
O. H. Tovar and J. L. Jones
Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms Reduce Shock-Induced Response Duration Dispersion Between Low and High Shock Intensities
Circ. Res., August 1, 1995; 77(2): 430 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. G. Fast and E. R. Cheek
Optical Mapping of Arrhythmias Induced by Strong Electrical Shocks in Myocyte Cultures
Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 664 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]