Circulation, Vol 85, 1510-1523, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association
JM Wharton, PD Wolf, WM Smith, PS Chen, DW Frazier, S Yabe, N Danieley and RE Ideker
BACKGROUND. Potential gradient field determination may be a helpful means
of describing the effects of defibrillation shocks; however, potential
gradient field requirements for defibrillation with different electrode
configurations have not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS. To evaluate
the field requirements for defibrillation, potential fields during
defibrillation shocks and the following ventricular activations were
recorded with 74 epicardial electrodes in 12 open-chest dogs with the use
of a computerized mapping system. Shock electrodes (2.64 cm2) were attached
to the lateral right atrium (R), lateral left ventricular base (L), and
left ventricular apex (V). Four electrode configurations were tested:
single shocks of 14-msec duration given to two single anode-single cathode
configurations, R:V and L:V, and to one dual anode-single cathode
configuration, (R+L):V; and sequential 7-msec shocks separated by 1 msec
given to R:V and L:V (R:V-- --L:V). Defibrillation threshold (DFT) current
was significantly lower for R:V----L:V than for the other configurations
and markedly higher for L:V. Despite these differences, the minimum
potential gradients measured at DFT were not significantly different
(approximately 6-7 V/cm for each electrode configuration). Potential
gradient fields generated by the electrode configurations were markedly
uneven, with a 15-27-fold change from lowest to highest gradient, with the
greatest decrease in gradient occurring near the shock electrodes. Although
gradient fields varied with the electrode configuration, all configurations
produced weak fields along the right ventricular base. Early sites of
epicardial activation after all unsuccessful shocks occurred in areas in
which the field was weak; 87% occurred at sites with gradients less than 15
V/cm. Ventricular tachycardia originating in high gradient areas near shock
electrodes followed 11 of 67 successful shocks. CONCLUSIONS. These data
suggest that 1) defibrillation fields created by small epicardial
electrodes are very uneven; 2) achievement of a certain minimum potential
gradient over both ventricles is necessary for ventricular defibrillation;
3) the difference in shock strengths required to achieve this minimum
gradient over both ventricles may explain the differences in DFTs for
various electrode configurations; and 4) high gradient areas in the uneven
fields can induce ectopic activation after successful shocks.
ARTICLES
Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. 27710.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. B. Mitchell, E. A. Pineda, J. L. Titus, P. M. Bartosch, and D. G. Benditt Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: The importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1323 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Fast and E. R. Cheek Optical Mapping of Arrhythmias Induced by Strong Electrical Shocks in Myocyte Cultures Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 664 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Mowrey, Y. Cheng, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 27 - 39. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Butter, E. Meisel, J. Tebbenjohanns, L. Engelmann, E. Fleck, B. Schubert, S. Hahn, and D. Pfeiffer Transvenous Biventricular Defibrillation Halves Energy Requirements in Patients Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2533 - 2538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S Karagueuzian and P.-S. Chen Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: Implications for fibrillation and defibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 251 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zheng, M. E. Benser, G. P. Walcott, S. D. Girouard, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Reduction of Atrial Defibrillation Threshold With an Interatrial Septal Electrode Circulation, November 21, 2000; 102(21): 2659 - 2664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Winter, J. E. Heil, C. Schumann, Y. Lin, C. M. Schannwell, U. Michel, J. D. Schipke, H. D. Schulte, and E. Gams Effect of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead placement in the right ventricle on defibrillation energy requirements. A combined experimental and clinical study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 14(4): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. S. Cooper, V. J. Plumb, A. E. Epstein, G. N. Kay, and R. E. Ideker Marked Reduction in Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds With Dual-Current Pathways and Sequential Shocks in Humans Circulation, June 30, 1998; 97(25): 2527 - 2535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, M. J. Niebauer, P. J. Tchou, and B. L. Wilkoff Additional Lead Improves Defibrillation Efficacy With an Abdominal `Hot Can' Electrode System Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4400 - 4407. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Neunlist and L. Tung Dose-dependent reduction of cardiac transmembrane potential by high-intensity electrical shocks Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2817 - H2825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. S. Cooper, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Internal Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation : Marked Reduction in Defibrillation Threshold With Dual Current Pathways Circulation, October 21, 1997; 96(8): 2693 - 2700. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3082 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. H. Tovar and J. L. Jones Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms Reduce Shock-Induced Response Duration Dispersion Between Low and High Shock Intensities Circ. Res., August 1, 1995; 77(2): 430 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Fast and E. R. Cheek Optical Mapping of Arrhythmias Induced by Strong Electrical Shocks in Myocyte Cultures Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 664 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1992 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |