This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bardy, G. H. Articles by Hofer, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bardy, G. H. Articles by Hofer, B.

Circulation, Vol 85, 1689-1698, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Clinical experience with a tiered-therapy, multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device

GH Bardy, C Troutman, JE Poole, PJ Kudenchuk, GL Dolack, G Johnson and B Hofer
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

BACKGROUND. The purpose of this report is to describe our initial experience with a tiered-therapy, variable detection criteria, multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device capable of antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion, and defibrillation in 50 cardiac arrest survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS. An epicardial lead system was used in 35 patients. A transvenous lead system was used in 15 patients. The index arrhythmia leading to device implantation was ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 23 patients, ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 21 patients, and both VT and VF in six patients. Postoperatively, all 50 patients benefited from the additional functions available in the new device compared with a device capable only of high-energy termination of arrhythmias using a simple rate detection algorithm. Total patient survival over a mean follow-up period of 15 +/- 5 months was 96%, with no patient succumbing to sudden arrhythmic death, cardiac death, or surgical death. Nine patients (18%) avoided the need for a bradycardia pacemaker because of the device's backup bradycardia pacing function. A programmable tachycardia cycle length stability algorithm prevented inappropriate device intervention into atrial fibrillation in 11 patients (22%). Detection schema flexibility, antitachycardia pacing capabilities, and low-energy cardioversion options allowed the elimination or avoidance of antiarrhythmic drugs in 41 patients (82%). Device data storage facilitated troubleshooting and reprogramming of detection algorithms and therapeutic schema in all 50 patients. Finally, the ability to perform noninvasive programmed electrical stimulation obviated the need for invasive cardiac catheterization in 35 of 35 patients who required electrophysiological testing after device implantation. CONCLUSIONS. These findings indicate that a multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device can provide a substantial advance in the treatment of patients with disabling or life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias by minimizing the use of painful shocks, reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs, lowering the incidence of inappropriate shocks, facilitating electrophysiological evaluation, and obviating the need for dual-device therapy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Gradaus, K. Seidl, T. Korte, E. Himmrich, H. Wieneke, A. Schuchert, W. Bauer, J. Gerss, C. G. Wollmann, M. Borggrefe, et al. Reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by treatment of atrial fibrillation in ICD patients with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter/defibrillators capable of atrial therapy delivery: the REVERT-AF Study Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 534 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Committee Members, G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2002; 40(9): 1703 - 1719. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, M. J. Silka, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2145 - 2161. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Stein, D. E. Euler, R. Mehra, K. Seidl, D. J. Slotwiner, S. Mittal, S. M. Markowitz, B. B. Lerman, and Jewel AF Worldwide Investigators Do atrial tachyarrhythmias beget ventricular tachyarrhythmias in defibrillator recipients? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2002; 40(2): 335 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Mitchell, E. A. Pineda, J. L. Titus, P. M. Bartosch, and D. G. Benditt Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: The importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1323 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Adler II, C. Wolpert, E. N. Warman, S. K. Musley, J. L. Koehler, and D. E. Euler Efficacy of Pacing Therapies for Treating Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias Receiving a Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Circulation, August 21, 2001; 104(8): 887 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Kowey Pharmacological Effects of Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Review and Update Arch Intern Med, February 23, 1998; 158(4): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Schaumann, F. v. z. Muhlen, B. Herse, B.-D. Gonska, and H. Kreuzer Empirical Versus Tested Antitachycardia Pacing in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators : A Prospective Study Including 200 Patients Circulation, January 13, 1998; 97(1): 66 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Fahy, E. B. Sgarbossa, P. J. Tchou, and S. L. Pinski Hospital Readmission in Patients Treated With Tiered-Therapy Implantable Defibrillators Circulation, September 15, 1996; 94(6): 1350 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. Bocker, W. Haverkamp, M. Block, M. Borggrefe, D. Hammel, and G. Breithardt Comparison of d,l-Sotalol and Implantable Defibrillators for Treatment of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, July 15, 1996; 94(2): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Garcia-Alberola, S. Yli-Mayry, M. Block, W. Haverkamp, A. Martinez-Rubio, H. Kottkamp, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe RR Interval Variability in Irregular Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 295 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. L. Pinski and G. J. Fahy The Proarrhythmic Potential of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1651 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. M. Gillis, R. S. Sheldon, D. G. Wyse, J. W. Leitch, R. Yee, G. J. Klein, H. J. Duff, and L. B. Mitchell Long-term Reproducibility of Ventricular Tachycardia Induction in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillators : Serial Noninvasive Studies Circulation, May 15, 1995; 91(10): 2605 - 2613. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. O. Nunain, M. Roelke, T. Trouton, S. Osswald, Y. H. Kim, G. Sosa-Suarez, D. R. Brooks, B. McGovern, M. Guy, D. F. Torchiana, et al. Limitations and Late Complications of Third-Generation Automatic Cardioverter-Defibrillators Circulation, April 15, 1995; 91(8): 2204 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text]