Circulation, Vol 85, 2275-2283, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association
H Baumgartner, SS Khan, M DeRobertis, LS Czer and G Maurer
BACKGROUND. Although Doppler echocardiography has been shown to be accurate
in assessing stenotic orifice areas in native valves, its accuracy in
evaluating the prosthetic valve orifice area remains undetermined. METHODS
AND RESULTS. Doppler-estimated valve areas were studied for their agreement
with catheter-derived Gorlin effective orifice areas and their flow
dependence in five sizes (19/20-27 mm) of St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, and
Hancock aortic valves using a pulsatile flow model. Doppler areas were
calculated three ways: using the standard continuity equation; using its
simplified modification (peak flow/peak velocity); and using the Gorlin
equation with Doppler pressure gradients. The results were compared with
Gorlin effective orifice areas derived from direct flow and catheter
pressure measurements. Excellent correlation between Gorlin effective
orifice areas and the three Doppler approaches was found in all three valve
types (r = 0.93-0.99, SEE = 0.07-0.11 cm2). In Medtronic-Hall and Hancock
valves, there was only slight underestimation by Doppler (mean difference,
0.003-0.25 cm2). In St. Jude valves, however, all three Doppler methods
significantly underestimated effective orifice areas derived from direct
flow and pressure measurements (mean difference, 0.40-0.57 cm2) with
differences as great as 1.6 cm2. In general, the modified continuity
equation calculated the largest Doppler areas. When orifice areas were
calculated from the valve geometry using the area determined from the inner
valve diameter reduced by the projected area of the opened leaflets, Gorlin
effective orifice areas were much closer to the geometric orifice areas
than Doppler areas (mean difference, 0.40 +/- 0.31 versus 1.04 +/- 0.20
cm2). In St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall valves, areas calculated by either
technique did not show a consistent or clinically significant flow
dependence. In Hancock valves, however, areas calculated by both the
continuity equation and the Gorlin equation decreased significantly (p less
than 0.001) with low flow rates. CONCLUSIONS. Doppler echocardiography
using either the continuity equation or Gorlin formula allows in vitro
calculation of Medtronic-Hall and Hancock effective valve orifice areas but
underestimates valve areas in St. Jude valves. This phenomenon is due to
localized high velocities in St. Jude valves, which do not reflect the mean
velocity distribution across the orifice. Valve areas are flow independent
in St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses but decrease significantly with
low flow in Hancock valves, suggesting that bioprosthetic leaflets may not
open fully at low flow rates.
ARTICLES
Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study
Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, A. Rudolph, R. Wassmuth, S. Bohl, E. E. Buschmann, H. Abdel-Aty, R. Dietz, and J. Schulz-Menger Feasibility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Assess the Orifice Area of Aortic Bioprostheses Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 397 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Mascherbauer and H Baumgartner The authors' reply: Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 592 - 593. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Mascherbauer, R Rosenhek, C Fuchs, E Pernicka, U Klaar, C Scholten, M Heger, G Wollenek, G Maurer, and H Baumgartner Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has no impact on short-term and long-term mortality Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1639 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Haaverstad, N. Vitale, A. Karevold, G. Cappabianca, A. Tromsdal, P. S. Olsen, L. Kober, H. Ihlen, K. A. Rein, and J. L Svennevig Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 500 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Otero, J. L. Pomar, J. M. Revuelta, and J. J. Rufilanchas Comparative Evaluation of Small-Size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP Heart Valve Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1284 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ruel, F. D. Rubens, R. G. Masters, A. L. Pipe, P. Bedard, P. J. Hendry, B. K. Lam, I. G. Burwash, W. G. Goldstein, M. P. Brais, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 127(1): 149 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Banbury, D. M. Cosgrove III, J. D. Thomas, E. H. Blackstone, J. Rajeswaran, J. E. Okies, and R. M. Frater Hemodynamic stability during 17 years of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1460 - 1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, I. Wallentin, P. Ask, and B. Wranne Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: An in vivo and in vitro study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, and L.-G. Durand Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity : A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Khan, R. J. Siegel, M. A. DeRobertis, C. E. Blanche, R. M. Kass, W. Cheng, G. P. Fontana, and A. Trento Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 531 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Y. Leung, J. Wong, L. Rodriguez, M. Pu, P. M. Vandervoort, and J. D. Thomas Application of Color Doppler Flow Mapping to Calculate Orifice Area of St Jude Mitral Valve Circulation, September 22, 1998; 98(12): 1205 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H. Marcus, R. S. Heinrich, J. Bednarz, S. Lupovitch, J. Abruzzo, R. Borok, B. Vandenberg, R. E. Kerber, W. Piccione, A. P. Yoganathan, et al. Assessment of Small-Diameter Aortic Mechanical Prostheses : Physiological Relevance of the Doppler Gradient, Utility of Flow Augmentation, and Limitations of Orifice Area Estimation Circulation, September 1, 1998; 98(9): 866 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Khan, A. Chaux, J. Matloff, C. Blanche, M. DeRobertis, R. Kass, T. P. Tsai, A. Trento, S. Nessim, R. Gray, et al. The St. Jude Medical valveExperience with 1000 cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1994; 108(6): 1010 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|