Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;85:2316-2321

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saksena, S.
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saksena, S.
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A. J.

Circulation, Vol 85, 2316-2321, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Implantable defibrillators for prevention of sudden death. Technology at a medical and economic crossroad

S Saksena and AJ Camm

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy is now widely used for the treatment of symptomatic patients with documented or suspected life- threatening VTs. Although sudden death recurrence in ICD recipients is virtually eliminated, the extent of benefit both with respect to cardiac mortality and total survival in this patient population remains to be accurately quantitated, particularly vis-a-vis alternative antiarrhythmic therapies. Advanced device and lead systems can be expected to further improve both patient survival and quality of life after implant. The economic impact of unrestrained proliferation in ICD therapy can be enormous; however, available cost-benefit analyses support judicious use of this therapy with comparable economic impact to other accepted cardiovascular therapies. Such prospective risk stratification becomes economically essential when considering expanding its application to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic populations at potential risk for future cardiac arrest.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. F.D. Wever, R. N.W. Hauer, G. Schrijvers, F. J.L. van Capelle, J. G.P. Tijssen, H. J.G.M. Crijns, A. Algra, H. Ramanna, P. F.A. Bakker, and E. O. Robles de Medina
Cost-effectiveness of Implantable Defibrillator as First-Choice Therapy Versus Electrophysiologically Guided, Tiered Strategy in Postinfarct Sudden Death Survivors : A Randomized Study
Circulation, February 1, 1996; 93(3): 489 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. A. Omoigui, F. I. Marcus, J. W. Mason, E. A. Hahn, V. L. Hartz, and M. A. Hlatky
Cost of Initial Therapy in the Electrophysiological Study Versus ECG Monitoring Trial (ESVEM)
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1070 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Roden
Risks and Benefits of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 22, 1994; 331(12): 785 - 791.
[Full Text]