Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;86:414-419

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Ramshorst, B.
Right arrow Articles by Eikelboom, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Ramshorst, B.
Right arrow Articles by Eikelboom, B. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Thinners
Hazardous Substances DB
*HEPARIN

Circulation, Vol 86, 414-419, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Thrombus regression in deep venous thrombosis. Quantification of spontaneous thrombolysis with duplex scanning

B van Ramshorst, PS van Bemmelen, H Hoeneveld, JA Faber and BC Eikelboom
Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Holland.

BACKGROUND. Thrombus regression in heparin-treated, acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity is poorly documented in the literature; different rates of thrombus resolution and recanalization are reported. METHODS AND RESULTS. In a prospective follow-up study, duplex scanning was used to evaluate the thrombus regression in patients with documented acute femoropopliteal thrombosis. Eighty vein segments in 20 legs of 18 patients were subjected to repeat duplex scans at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 26 weeks after diagnosis; 49 segments showed thrombus at diagnosis. The popliteal vein showed the highest thrombus load at diagnosis, followed in descending order by the superficial femoral, profunda femoris, and common femoral vein segments (p less than 0.001). Thrombus regression was significant (p less than 0.001) in all segments and proceeded at an exponential rate that was equal in the different vein segments of the upper leg. Both thrombus resolution and recanalization appeared to be a function of the initial thrombus load and could not be related to individual vein segments. Recanalization was seen in 23 of 31 initially occluded segments and occurred within the first 6 weeks after diagnosis in 20 of 23 segments. Extension of thrombus despite anticoagulant therapy was observed in 15 vein segments and was not related to the initial thrombosis score (p = 0.1) or individual vein segments (p = 0.23). Thrombus extension in seven patients with prethrombotic conditions was not different (p = 0.9) from the other patients. CONCLUSIONS. Duplex scanning is an important noninvasive tool to quantify thrombus regression in acute deep venous thrombosis in detail without unnecessary discomfort to the patient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. Bellosta, P. Ferrari, L. Luzzani, C. Carugati, L. Cossu, M. Talarico, and A. Sarcina
Home Therapy With LMWH in Deep Vein Thrombosis: Randomized Study Comparing Single and Double Daily Administrations
Angiology, June 1, 2007; 58(3): 316 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. Ascher, P. S. DePippo, A. Hingorani, W. Yorkovich, and S. Salles-Cunha
Does Repeat Duplex Ultrasound for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Influence Patient Management?
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2004; 38(6): 525 - 531.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
T. M. Hyers
Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Past, Present, and Future
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2003; 163(7): 759 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. Prandoni, A. W.A. Lensing, M. H. Prins, E. Bernardi, A. Marchiori, P. Bagatella, M. Frulla, L. Mosena, D. Tormene, A. Piccioli, et al.
Residual Venous Thrombosis as a Predictive Factor of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
Ann Intern Med, December 17, 2002; 137(12): 955 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. S. Katz, P. A. Loud, D. Bruce, A. M. Gittleman, R. Mueller, D. L. Klippenstein, and Z. D. Grossman
Combined CT Venography and Pulmonary Angiography: A Comprehensive Review
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2002; 22(90001): S3 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Sugimoto, M. Okada, T. Mukai, and Y. Morimoto
Clinical Assessment of Vascular Thrombosis Using Indium-111 Platelet Scintigraphy
Angiology, January 1, 2000; 51(1): 61 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
M. T Caps, M. H Meissner, M. J Tullis, N. L Polissar, R. A Manzo, B. K Zierler, W. L Chandler, and D E. Strandness Jr
Venous thrombus stability during acute phase of therapy
Vascular Medicine, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. L. Keefe, N. Roistacher, and M. K. Pierri
Evaluation of Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis in Oncologic Patients
Angiology, September 1, 1994; 45(9): 771 - 775.
[Abstract] [PDF]