Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1992;86:1421-1428

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dias, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ellenbogen, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dias, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ellenbogen, K. A.

Circulation, Vol 86, 1421-1428, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous diltiazem in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

VC Dias, SJ Weir and KA Ellenbogen
Department of Clinical Research, Marion Merrell Dow Inc., Kansas City, Mo 64134-0627.

BACKGROUND. Diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of patients in atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. However, there have been no pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of diltiazem in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous diltiazem were determined in 32 patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (mean +/- SD age, 66 +/- 7 years; mean baseline heart rate, 131 +/- 10 beats per minute) after 20 mg or 20 mg followed by 25-mg bolus doses and a 10 and 15 mg/hr infusion for 24 hours. After the 10 and 15 mg/hr infusions of diltiazem, mean +/- SD elimination half-life was 6.8 +/- 1.8 and 6.9 +/- 1.5 hours, volume of distribution was 411 +/- 151.8 and 299 +/- 70.8 I, and systemic clearance was 42 +/- 12.4 and 31 +/- 8.3 l/hr, respectively. Percentages of the plasma concentrations of the principal metabolites desacetyldiltiazem and N-desmethyldiltiazem to diltiazem were < 15% and < 10%, respectively. Thirty of 32 patients maintained response throughout the 24-hour infusion of diltiazem. Using a sigmoidal Emax pharmacodynamic model, a strong relation (mean +/- SD r2, 0.78 +/- 0.2) was observed between plasma diltiazem concentration and percent heart rate reduction. Mean +/- SD Emax (maximum percent reduction in heart rate from baseline) and EC50 (plasma diltiazem concentration that achieves half Emax) were 52 +/- 17% and 110 +/- 84 ng/ml, respectively. The model predicts that mean plasma diltiazem concentration of 79, 172, and 294 ng/ml are required to produce a 20%, 30%, and 40% reduction in heart rate, respectively. A relation between plasma diltiazem concentration and percent change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline was not observed (mean +/- SD r2, SBP/DBP: 0.35 +/- 0.24/0.36 +/- 0.2). There were no untoward side effects observed. CONCLUSIONS. First, the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter is nonlinear with an apparent dose-dependent decrease in systemic clearance with increasing infusion rate. Second, using a sigmoidal Emax model, there is a strong relation between plasma diltiazem concentration and percent heart rate reduction. Third, the plasma concentrations of the principal metabolites desacetyldiltiazem and N- desmethyldiltiazem are low and are not expected to contribute significantly to the pharmacodynamics of intravenous diltiazem in these patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
C Demircan, H I Cikriklar, Z Engindeniz, H Cebicci, N Atar, V Guler, E O Unlu, and B Ozdemir
Comparison of the effectiveness of intravenous diltiazem and metoprolol in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation
Emerg. Med. J., June 1, 2005; 22(6): 411 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Amar and M. Fleisher
Diltiazem Treatment Does Not Alter Renal Function After Thoracic Surgery
Chest, May 1, 2001; 119(5): 1476 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. Amar, N. Roistacher, V. W. Rusch, D. H. Y. Leung, I. Ginsburg, H. Zhang, M. S. Bains, R. J. Downey, R. J. Korst, and R. J. Ginsberg
Effects of diltiazem prophylaxis on the incidence and clinical outcome of atrial arrhythmias after thoracic surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2000; 120(4): 790 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Amar, N. Roistacher, M. E. Burt, V. W. Rusch, M. S. Bains, D. H. Y. Leung, R. J. Downey, and R. J. Ginsberg
Effects of Diltiazem Versus Digoxin on Dysrhythmias and Cardiac Function After Pneumonectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1374 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text]