This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ho, D. S. Articles by Richards, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ho, D. S. Articles by Richards, D. A.

Circulation, Vol 87, 857-865, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Improved identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia using a 28-lead optimal array

DS Ho, RA Denniss, JB Uther, DL Ross and DA Richards
Cardiology Unit, Westmead Hospital, Australia.

BACKGROUND. Although the signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) is currently the best noninvasive test to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) following myocardial infarction (MI), it is still a relatively insensitive test. Body surface mapping has improved the sensitivity of ECG in detecting various cardiac diseases. This study applied body surface mapping to the SAECG in the form of a clinically practical, 28- lead optimal array and compared its sensitivity and specificity with those of an orthogonal array. METHODS AND RESULTS. Two hundred twenty- three patients with previous MI (82 with inducible VT) underwent SAECG using 28 surface electrodes from which were obtained a three-lead orthogonal array and a 28-lead optimal array (optimal). From the orthogonal array, two QRS durations (QRSd) were obtained using the combined vector magnitude method (CVM) and the earliest onset to latest offset of the three individually filtered leads (individual). From the optimal array, 28 QRSd were obtained, each defined as the duration from the earliest onset of any of the 28 leads to the offset of each individually filtered lead. QRSd > 120 msec in > or = 3 leads was considered abnormal. For CVM and individual, QRSd of > 120 msec were considered abnormal. While the specificity of each method was comparable (84%, 86%, and 84% for CVM, individual, and optimal, respectively), the sensitivity of optimal (70%) was significantly greater than the sensitivity of CVM (54%) (p = 0.001) or individual (59%) (p = 0.004). The magnitude of improvement in sensitivity, 16% and 15%, respectively, was equal for anterior (n = 120) and inferior (n = 103) infarctions. CONCLUSIONS. Body surface mapping using the 28-lead optimal array significantly improved the sensitivity of the SAECG without loss of specificity. The increased sensitivity was of equal magnitude for inferior and anterior infarctions. The superiority and practicality of the 28-lead optimal array make it worth pursuing as an option for further refinement in SAECG.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. L. Hubley-Kozey, L. B. Mitchell, M. J. Gardner, J. W. Warren, C. J. Penney, E. R. Smith, and B. M. Horacek Spatial Features in Body-Surface Potential Maps Can Identify Patients With a History of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, October 1, 1995; 92(7): 1825 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text]