Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1993;87:1123-1129

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baim, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baim, D. S.

Circulation, Vol 87, 1123-1129, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Lesion-to-lesion independence of restenosis after treatment by conventional angioplasty, stenting, or directional atherectomy. Validation of lesion-based restenosis analysis

CM Gibson, RE Kuntz, M Nobuyoshi, B Rosner and DS Baim
Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

BACKGROUND. Since many restenosis trials include patients in whom more than one lesion is treated, analysis of the angiographic data on a "per lesion" basis might be confounded by potential correlations of restenosis among multiple treated lesions within each patient. The goals of this study were: 1) to determine whether there was any correlation in the rate of restenosis among multiple lesions that underwent conventional angioplasty, stenting, or directional atherectomy within the same patient and 2) to determine whether lesions treated in a multilesion intervention experience a different magnitude of restenosis than lesions undergoing single-lesion procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS. Of 441 patients treated by Palmaz-Schatz stenting (n = 114), directional atherectomy (n = 100), or conventional balloon angioplasty (n = 227), 67 underwent multilesion procedures involving treatment of 146 lesions. A general linear model with intraclass correlation (GLIMIC) was used to calculate the coefficient of correlation (rho) of the change in the measured minimum luminal diameter (late loss) from the time of the initial procedure to 6-month angiogram among the multiple lesions within the same patient for all 441 patients. This showed no correlation among multiple lesions within the same patient for the late loss in minimum luminal diameter (rho = - 0.12 [95% CI: -0.40, 0.12]), among lesions in the same vessel (rho = 0.14 [95% CI: -0.34, 0.62]), or among different vessels (rho = -0.18 [95% CI: -0.52, 0.16]), suggesting that the magnitude of late loss is independent among multiple lesions within the same patient. There was no difference (p = 0.96) between the observed incidence of zero-, one-, and two-vessel restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) for patients with multiple-lesion treatment and that predicted assuming lesion-to-lesion independence. Similarly, there was no difference in late loss or in the overall binary restenosis rate when single-lesion procedures were compared with multilesion procedures. Multivariable analysis of the late loss in lumen diameter (which adjusted for the effects of the acute result and the device used) demonstrated no independent effect (p = 0.20) of single-lesion versus multilesion status. CONCLUSIONS. Luminal encroachment appears to occur at independent rates among multiple lesions treated in a single patient. The observed incidence of restenosis for patients with multiple treated lesions is accurately predicted assuming independent probabilities of restenosis. Lesion-based analysis, even when including multiple treated lesions within the same patient, is thus valid for evaluating conventional angioplasty, stenting, or directional atherectomy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
R A Byrne, S Eberle, A Kastrati, A Dibra, G Ndrepepa, R Iijima, J Mehilli, and A Schomig
Distribution of angiographic measures of restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation
Heart, October 1, 2009; 95(19): 1572 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. T. Willerson
Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiologic Interventional Devices
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 561 - 580.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T.-l. Yue, J. Chen, W. Bao, P. K. Narayanan, A. Bril, W. Jiang, P. G. Lysko, J.-L. Gu, R. Boyce, D. M. Zimmerman, et al.
In Vivo Myocardial Protection From Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist Rosiglitazone
Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2588 - 2594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Takagi, T. Akasaka, A. Yamamuro, Y. Honda, T. Hozumi, S. Morioka, and K. Yoshida
Troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: A serial intravascular ultrasound study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1529 - 1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Takagi, K. Yoshida, T. Akasaka, S. Kaji, T. Kawamoto, Y. Honda, A. Yamamuro, T. Hozumi, and S. Morioka
Hyperinsulinemia during oral glucose tolerance test is associated with increased neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in nondiabetic patients: A serial intravascular ultrasound study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 731 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Escaned, J. Goicolea, F. Alfonso, M. J. Perez-Vizcayno, R. Hernandez, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, C. Banuelos, and C. Macaya
Propensity and mechanisms of restenosis in different coronary stent designs: Complementary value of the analysis of the luminal gain-loss relationship
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1490 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
A. Magdy, M. Al-Abbady, A. Ghoga, K. Heib, and C. Ozbek
Restenosis After Angioplasty in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1999; 7(3): 209 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, S. Elezi, H. Schuhlen, M. Wilhelm, and J. Dirschinger
Interlesion Dependence of the Risk for Restenosis in Patients With Coronary Stent Placement in Multiple Lesions
Circulation, June 23, 1998; 97(24): 2396 - 2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, S. Elezi, H. Schuhlen, J. Dirschinger, F. Dannegger, M. Wilhelm, and K. Ulm
Bimodal Distribution of Angiographic Measures of Restenosis Six Months After Coronary Stent Placement
Circulation, December 2, 1997; 96(11): 3880 - 3887.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Casscells
Growth Factor Therapies for Vascular Injury and Ischemia
Circulation, June 1, 1995; 91(11): 2699 - 2702.
[Full Text]