This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumgartner, H. Articles by Kuhn, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baumgartner, H. Articles by Kuhn, P.

Circulation, Vol 87, 1320-1327, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Effect of prosthetic valve malfunction on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation for bileaflet aortic valve prostheses

H Baumgartner, H Schima and P Kuhn
Second Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

BACKGROUND. Considerable discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients caused by localized gradients and pressure recovery have been reported for normal bileaflet aortic valve prostheses. METHODS AND RESULTS. To examine whether this Doppler-catheter gradient relation is affected by prosthetic valve malfunction, a 19-mm CarboMedics aortic valve was simultaneously studied with continuous-wave Doppler and catheter technique in normal function and in various states of malfunction ranging from slightly restricted opening to total occlusion of one leaflet. For each functional status, peak and mean gradients were measured at eight different flow rates (cardiac output, 2.0-6.0 L/min). Excellent correlation between Doppler and catheter gradients was found regardless of the valve function (r = 0.99, SEE = 1.0-3.3 mm Hg). However, the relation between Doppler and catheter gradient was highly dependent on the function of the valve as shown by a variation of slopes from 1.08 to 2.08. For the normally functioning valve (angle between flow axis and leaflet 5 degrees), peak and mean Doppler gradients were approximately twice the catheter gradients (slope, 2.08 and 2.03 for peak and mean gradients, respectively). Slightly restricted opening of one leaflet (22 degrees) significantly altered the Doppler-catheter gradient relation, and slopes decreased to 1.69 (p < 0.01) and 1.52 (p < 0.001) for peak and mean gradients, respectively. The differences between Doppler and catheter gradients significantly decreased with further restriction of valve opening, and slopes ranged from 1.25 to 1.41 for angles between 34 degrees and 52 degrees. When one leaflet was totally occluded, the slope finally dropped to 1.08 for both peak and mean gradients, and Doppler gradients were only slightly greater than catheter gradients. Gradients increased with malfunction of the valve caused by reduction of the effective orifice area. However, the increase of Doppler gradients was considerably smaller than the increase of simultaneous catheter gradients. CONCLUSIONS. The discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients that have been reported for normally functioning bileaflet aortic valve prostheses may be reduced or even disappear in patients with malfunctioning valves. Furthermore, the increase of Doppler gradients caused by malfunction of the valve may underestimate the true hemodynamic changes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. A. Flachskampf, J.-U. Voigt, and W. G. Daniel CHAPTER 4 Cardiac Ultrasound ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, G. M. De Matteis, E. Caprara, F. Tomai, A. P. de Peppo, P. Polisca, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello EXTENT AND PATTERN OF REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL SIZE CARBOMEDICS AORTIC VALVES J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 901 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound: Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1934 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text]