Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1993;88:481-491

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pouleur, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pouleur, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, S.

Circulation, Vol 88, 481-491, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on left ventricular diastolic properties in patients with depressed ejection fraction. SOLVD Investigators

H Pouleur, MF Rousseau, C van Eyll, L Stoleru, W Hayashida, JA Udelson, N Dolan, D Kinan, P Gallagher and S Ahn
Division of Cardiology, University of Louvain, School of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium.

BACKGROUND. The aim of the present study was to analyze the changes in left ventricular diastolic function that occur in patients with chronic severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the absence or presence of prolonged therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. METHODS AND RESULTS. Left ventricular function data (cineangiography plus Millar, frame-by-frame analysis) and right ventricular volumes (radionuclide angiography) were obtained at baseline and after an average follow-up of 12.4 months in 42 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less. After baseline measurements, the patients were randomized to placebo (n = 16) or enalapril (10 mg BID, n = 26). In the placebo group, the changes in left ventricular function were characterized by increases in end-diastolic (159 +/- 43 to 170 +/- 44 mL/m2) and end-systolic (119 +/- 38 to 128 +/- 49 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a downward and rightward shift of the diastolic pressure- volume relation. In contrast, decreases in end-diastolic (166 +/- 43 to 156 +/- 47 mL/m2) and end-systolic (125 +/- 43 to 111 +/- 42 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a slight upward and leftward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation were noted in the enalapril group. These changes in left ventricular volumes were significantly different between groups (both P < .005) but were not attended by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, in time constant of isovolumic pressure decrease, or in right ventricular volumes. However, the chamber stiffness constant beta decreased from 0.044 +/- 0.027 to 0.032 +/- 0.019 mL-1/m2 in the placebo group, whereas it increased insignificantly in the enalapril group (0.040 +/- 0.028 to 0.041 +/- 0.028 mL-1/m2). These changes in chamber stiffness constant beta between baseline and follow-up were significantly different between placebo and enalapril groups (P < .05). Another index of chamber compliance, delta V/delta P, also confirmed the presence of opposite changes in left ventricular chamber compliance in the placebo group and in the enalapril group. The mean diastolic wall stress increased with placebo but not with enalapril (+51 versus -13 kdyn/cm2; P < .04) whereas left ventricular mass and the indexes of left ventricular sphericity tended to improve in the enalapril group. The changes in plasma levels of norepinephrine, atrial natriuretic peptide, and arginine vasopressin were, however, comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS. The data indicate that in patients with severe systolic left ventricular dysfunction, the progressive left ventricular dilatation was accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular chamber stiffness; enalapril therapy was able to prevent or partially reverse these changes and tended to reduce left ventricular mass and ventricular sphericity. Those changes were suggestive of partial reversal of left ventricular remodeling by enalapril administration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
U. Wisloff, A. Stoylen, J. P. Loennechen, M. Bruvold, O. Rognmo, P. M. Haram, A. E. Tjonna, J. Helgerud, S. A. Slordahl, S. J. Lee, et al.
Superior Cardiovascular Effect of Aerobic Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Study
Circulation, June 19, 2007; 115(24): 3086 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Klotz, I. Hay, M. L. Dickstein, G.-H. Yi, J. Wang, M. S. Maurer, D. A. Kass, and D. Burkhoff
Single-beat estimation of end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship: a novel method with potential for noninvasive application
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H403 - H412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. A. Ahn, P. Jong, S. Yusuf, S. I. Bangdiwala, H. G. Pouleur, and M. F. Rousseau
Early Versus Delayed Enalapril in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Impact on Morbidity and Mortality 15 Years After the SOLVD Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1904 - 1905.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. K. Hamlin, P. S. Villars, J. T. Kanusky, and A. D. Shaw
Role of Diastole in Left Ventricular Function, II: Diagnosis and Treatment
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2004; 13(6): 453 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Wong, L. Staszewsky, R. Latini, S. Barlera, R. Glazer, N. Aknay, A. Hester, I. Anand, and J. N. Cohn
Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure: Valsartan heart failure trial (Val-HeFT) echocardiographic data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 2022 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Y. Nakamura, M. Yoshiyama, T. Omura, K. Yoshida, Y. Izumi, K. Takeuchi, S. Kim, H. Iwao, and J. Yoshikawa
Beneficial effects of combination of ACE inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on cardiac remodeling in rat myocardial infarction
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2003; 57(1): 48 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Colson, F. Ryckwaert, and P. Coriat
Renin Angiotensin System Antagonists and Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1143 - 1143.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Yoshiyama, K. Takeuchi, T. Omura, S. Kim, H. Yamagishi, I. Toda, M. Teragaki, K. Akioka, H. Iwao, and J. Yoshikawa
Effects of Candesartan and Cilazapril on Rats With Myocardial Infarction Assessed by Echocardiography
Hypertension, April 1, 1999; 33(4): 961 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. T. Weber
Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in Heart Failure : A Role for De Novo Angiotensin II Generation
Circulation, December 2, 1997; 96(11): 4065 - 4082.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. A. Kouatli, J. A. Garcia, T. M. Zellers, E. M. Weinstein, and L. Mahony
Enalapril Does Not Enhance Exercise Capacity in Patients After Fontan Procedure
Circulation, September 2, 1997; 96(5): 1507 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Greenberg, M. A. Quinones, C. Koilpillai, M. Limacher, D. Shindler, C. Benedict, and B. Shelton
Effects of Long-term Enalapril Therapy on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Results of the SOLVD Echocardiography Substudy
Circulation, May 15, 1995; 91(10): 2573 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text]