Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1993;88:2023-2029

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, B. P.

Circulation, Vol 88, 2023-2029, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Evaluation of bioprosthetic valve-associated thrombus in ventricular assist device patients

WR Wagner, PC Johnson, RL Kormos and BP Griffith
Artificial Heart and Lung Program, University of Pittsburgh, PA.

BACKGROUND. Thromboembolic events may be related to thrombotic deposition on prosthetic valves. In a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) that contains two porcine pericardial bioprosthetic valves in addition to significant associated biomaterial placement, this may be particularly true. Thrombotic deposits on valves removed from LVADs at autopsy or heart transplantation were scored to determine (1) the nature and location of valvular deposition, (2) whether deposition was related to thromboembolic events, (3) correlations between deposition and patient hemodynamic and coagulation parameters, and (4) implant time dependency. METHODS AND RESULTS. Novacor LVADs were implanted in 23 patients as a bridge to transplantation for 1 to 303 days. Photographs of the concave (downstream) and convex (upstream) side of the inflow and outflow valve were made at explant and later scored for (1) total thrombus area (10 = equivalent of cusp area), (2) percent of cusp area occupied by solid thrombus, (3) thrombus color (10 = dark red, 0 = white), and (4) average percent of valve strut height involved with thrombus (from a side view). The inflow valve was shown to have heavier and redder deposition than the outflow valve. This was also true for the concave versus the convex side. Heaviest deposition was seen on the inflow valve concave side, which rests within the LVAD pumping sac and may be subject to poor convection. Patients with neurological thromboembolic events (8/23) during implantation had heavier deposition on the inflow valve concave side (5.7 +/- 2.7 versus 4.6 +/- 2.2, P < .05). Pump volumetric output was also found to negatively correlate with thrombus area on this valve and side (r = - .61, P = .002). Platelet release (platelet factor 4) was correlated with thrombus involvement on the upstream (convex) side of the inflow valve (r = .82, P = .002). No significant dependence of deposition on the implant time was found. CONCLUSIONS. Valve thrombus deposition was related to thromboembolic events. Pump volumetric output and platelet release were found to be related to deposition. These results may have implications for the role of hemodynamics and platelet activation in thromboembolism associated with prosthetic valve placement in general.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. G. Nabavi, J. Stockmann, C. Schmid, M. Schneider, D. Hammel, H. H. Scheld, and E. B. Ringelstein
Doppler microembolic load predicts risk of thromboembolic complications in Novacor patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 160 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Itescu and R. John
Interactions between the recipient immune system and the left ventricular assist device surface: immunological and clinical implications
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(90060): S58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. N. Kavarana, M. S. Pessin-Minsley, J. Urtecho, K. A. Catanese, M. Flannery, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka
Right ventricular dysfunction and organ failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: a continuing problem
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 745 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. J. Ankersmit, G. Wieselthaler, B. Moser, S. Gerlitz, G. Roth, G. Boltz-Nitulescu, and E. Wolner
Transitory immunologic response after implantation of the DeBakey VAD continuous-axial-flow pump
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 557 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. N. Kavarana, D. N. Helman, M. R. Williams, A. Barbone, J. A. Sanchez, E. A. Rose, M. C. Oz, M. Milbocker, and R. T. V. Kung
Circulatory support with a direct cardiac compression device: A less invasive approach with the AbioBooster device
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 786 - 787.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Rao, J. P. Slater, N. M. Edwards, Y. Naka, and M. C. Oz
Surgical management of valvular disease in patients requiring left ventricular assist device support
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1448 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D. Gagnon, M. Petty, and J. R Lahpor
HeartMate(R) family of left ventricular assist systems
Perfusion, July 1, 2000; 15(4): 345 - 354.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Schmid, M. Wilhelm, M. Rothenburger, D. Nabavi, M. C. Deng, D. Hammel, and H. H. Scheld
Effect of high dose platelet inhibitor treatment on thromboembolism in Novacor patients
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 17(3): 331 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. R. Wilhelm, J. Ristich, L. E. Knepper, R. Holubkov, S. R. Wisniewski, R. L. Kormos, and W. R. Wagner
Measurement of Hemostatic Indexes in Conjunction With Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices
Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2554 - 2561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. R. Gross
Concerning thromboembolism associated with left ventricular assist devices
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1999; 42(1): 45 - 47.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Schmid, M. Weyand, D. G. Nabavi, D. Hammel, M. C. Deng, E. B. Ringelstein, and H. H. Scheld
Cerebral and Systemic Embolization During Left Ventricular Support With the Novacor N100 Device
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1703 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
MehmetC. Oz, M. Argenziano, K. A. Catanese, M. T. Gardocki, D. J. Goldstein, R. C. Ashton, A. C. Gelijns, E. A. Rose, and H. R. Levin
Bridge Experience With Long-term Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Are They an Alternative to Transplantation?
Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1844 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. P. Slater, E. A. Rose, H. R. Levin, O. H. Frazier, J. K. Roberts, A. D. Weinberg, and M. C. Oz
Low Thromboembolic Risk Without Anticoagulation Using Advanced-Design Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1321 - 1327.
[Abstract] [Full Text]