Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1994;89:116-121

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kussmaul, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kussmaul, W. G.

Circulation, Vol 89, 116-121, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis

WK Laskey and WG Kussmaul
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

BACKGROUND: Pressure recovery is the variable increase in lateral pressure downstream from a stenotic orifice. The magnitude and clinical significance of pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis are poorly defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We obtained high-fidelity pressure and velocity recordings in 11 patients with isolated significant aortic valve stenosis at the time of diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Systematic catheter pullback from the left ventricular cavity revealed a consistent although variable subvalvular gradient. Further pullback across and distal to the region of the stenosed aortic valve revealed a consistent and progressive increase in the ascending aortic pressure. This increase in lateral pressure occurred pari passu with a diminution in amplitude of the velocity pulse. The extent of pressure recovery was directly related to systemic blood flow and transvalvular flow but inversely related to the Gorlin-derived aortic valve area. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have potentially important implications for the hemodynamic evaluation of mild to moderately severe aortic valve stenosis. The extent of pressure recovery may be of additional utility in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis under varying physiological states.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. K. Laskey, W. G. Kussmaul III, and A. Noordergraaf
Systemic Arterial Response to Exercise in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 996 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
J. B. Chambers
Aortic stenosis
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2009; 10(1): i11 - i19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. E. Richards, D. Deserranno, E. Donal, N. L. Greenberg, J. D. Thomas, and M. J. Garcia
Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1410 - H1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot
Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. Isaaz
The ratio of post-valvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas: a new haemodynamic index of clinical importance in patients with aortic stenosis?
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1294 - 1296.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch
Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Baumgartner, T. Stefenelli, J. Niederberger, H. Schima, and G. Maurer
"overestimation" of catheter gradients by doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1655 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner
Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound: Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro
Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1934 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. K. Laskey, W. G. Kussmaul, and A. Noordergraaf
Valvular and Systemic Arterial Hemodynamics in Aortic Valve Stenosis : A Model-Based Approach
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1473 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Voelker, H. Reul, G. N. Ing, T. S. Ing, B. S. Ing, A. S. Ing, and K. R. Karsch
Comparison of Valvular Resistance, Stroke Work Loss, and Gorlin Valve Area for Quantification of Aortic Stenosis : An In Vitro Study in a Pulsatile Aortic Flow Model
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1196 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text]