Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1994;89:216-223

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, F. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, S.

Circulation, Vol 89, 216-223, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Rise in chronic defibrillation thresholds in nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator

FJ Venditti Jr, DT Martin, G Vassolas and S Bowen
Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Mass. 01805.

BACKGROUND: To establish the chronic stability of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in a transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator (TCD) system, we studied 37 consecutive patients with TCD systems implanted for > 6 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: DFT was measured by a step-down method at implant and 2 and 6 months later. The mean ejection fraction was 34.5 +/- 14.3%. Coronary artery disease with previous myocardial infarction was present in 31 patients. The mean DFT rose from 13.3 +/- 4.3 J at implant to 16.5 +/- 4.7 J at 2 months (P < .001) and 17.6 +/- 5.4 J at 6 months (P < .0001). ANOVA revealed a statistically significant rise in DFT over time (P < .0005). At 2 months, 25 patients had a rise in DFT, and 14 had a rise > or = 5 J. The observed rise at 2 months persisted in 19 patients. A chronic rise, defined as > or = 5 J rise at 6 months, occurred in 17 patients. Univariate analysis of clinical as well as implant variables revealed no predictors of a rise in DFT in this group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is a significant rise in DFT at 2 and 6 months in this TCD system. Although the chronic threshold remained well within the available energy range of the pulse generator, this observation has important implications for implantation guidelines, programming, and future pulse generator development for TCD patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. H. Hohnloser, P. Dorian, R. Roberts, M. Gent, C. W. Israel, E. Fain, J. Champagne, and S. J. Connolly
Effect of Amiodarone and Sotalol on Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold: The Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Trial
Circulation, July 11, 2006; 114(2): 104 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. J. Rashba, M. R. Olsovsky, S. R. Shorofsky, M. M. Kirk, R. W. Peters, and M. R. Gold
Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1150 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Windecker, R. E. Ideker, V. J. Plumb, G. N. Kay, G. P. Walcott, and A. E. Epstein
The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. E. Epstein, G. N. Kay, V. J. Plumb, S. M. Dailey, and P. G. Anderson
Gross and Microscopic Pathological Changes Associated With Nonthoracotomy Implantable Defibrillator Leads
Circulation, October 13, 1998; 98(15): 1517 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Newman, A. Barr, M. Greene, D. Martin, M. Ham, S. Thorne, and P. Dorian
A Population-Based Method for the Estimation of Defibrillation Energy Requirements in Humans : Assessment of Time-Dependent Effects With a Transvenous Defibrillation System
Circulation, July 1, 1997; 96(1): 267 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Pacifico, K. R. Wheelan, N. Nasir, P. J. Wells, T. K. Doyle, S. A. Johnson, and P. D. Henry
Long-term Follow-up of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implanted Under Conscious Sedation in Prepectoral Subfascial Position
Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 946 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. J. Venditti, R. M. John, M. Hull, G. H. Tofler, D. M. Shahian, and D. T. Martin
Circadian Variation in Defibrillation Energy Requirements
Circulation, October 1, 1996; 94(7): 1607 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. M. Shahian, W. A. Williamson, L. G. Svensson, R. S. D'Agostino, D. T. Martin, J. R. Ellis, and F. J. Venditti
Transvenous versus transthoracic cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: A comparative analysis of morbidity, mortality, and survival
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1995; 109(6): 1066 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. R. Gold, S. Higgins, R. Klein, F. R. Gilliam, H. Kopelman, S. Hessen, J. Payne, S. A. Strickberger, D. Breiter, and S. Hahn
Efficacy and Temporal Stability of Reduced Safety Margins for Ventricular Defibrillation: Primary Results From the Low Energy Safety Study (LESS)
Circulation, April 30, 2002; 105(17): 2043 - 2048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]