Circulation, Vol 89, 1060-1067, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association
JD Martinez-Alday, J Almendral, A Arenal, JM Ormaetxe, A Pastor, JP Villacastin, O Medina, R Peinado and JL Delcan
BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia with
concentric atrial activation usually requires the inducibility of sustained
tachycardia and needs a complex and time-consuming electrophysiological
evaluation. To develop a simple test to establish if ventriculoatrial
conduction uses a posteroseptal accessory pathway or the normal conduction
system, we compared the ventriculoatrial intervals during right ventricular
pacing from apical and posterobasal sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Continuous
pacing was performed from an apical and a posterobasal right ventricular
site in 34 patients with retrograde conduction over the normal conduction
system (group A) and in 22 patients with conduction over a posteroseptal
accessory pathway (group B). During apical pacing, ventriculoatrial
intervals in group A (176 +/- 40 milliseconds) were not significantly
different than those in group B (197 +/- 47 milliseconds, P = NS). During
posterobasal pacing, group B patients had significantly shorter
ventriculoatrial intervals than group A patients (158 +/- 46 versus 197 +/-
39 milliseconds, P < .01). The difference between the ventriculoatrial
interval obtained during apical pacing and that obtained during
posterobasal pacing (ventriculoatrial index) discriminated between the two
groups without overlapping: It was positive in all group B patients (39 +/-
19; range, +10 to +70 milliseconds) and negative in all except two group A
patients (-21 +/- 13; range, -50 to +5 milliseconds; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: This ventriculoatrial index can identify accurately and in the
absence of tachycardia whether concentric retrograde conduction is
proceeding over a posteroseptal accessory pathway or over the normal
conduction system.
ARTICLES
Identification of concealed posteroseptal Kent pathways by comparison of ventriculoatrial intervals from apical and posterobasal right ventricular sites
Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, Hospital General Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. G Katritsis and A. J. Camm Classification and differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Michaud, H. Tada, S. Chough, R. Baker, K. Wasmer, C. Sticherling, H. Oral, F. Pelosi Jr, B. P. Knight, S. A. Strickberger, et al. Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory pathway by the response to ventricular pacing J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1163 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hirao, K. Otomo, X. Wang, K. J. Beckman, J. H. McClelland, L. Widman, M. D. Gonzalez, M. Arruda, H. Nakagawa, R. Lazzara, et al. Para-Hisian Pacing: A New Method for Differentiating Retrograde Conduction Over an Accessory AV Pathway From Conduction Over the AV Node Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 1027 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C.-E. Chiang, S.-A. Chen, C.-T. Tai, T.-J. Wu, S.-H. Lee, C.-C. Cheng, C.-W. Chiou, K.-C. Ueng, Z.-C. Wen, and M.-S. Chang Prediction of Successful Ablation Site of Concealed Posteroseptal Accessory Pathways by a Novel Algorithm Using Baseline Electrophysiological Parameters : Implication for an Abbreviated Ablation Procedure Circulation, March 1, 1996; 93(5): 982 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1994 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |