Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1994;89:1656-1664

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberger, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberger, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A. H.

Circulation, Vol 89, 1656-1664, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Assessment of effects of autonomic stimulation and blockade on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram

JJ Goldberger, MW Ahmed, MA Parker and AH Kadish
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.

BACKGROUND: Signal-averaged ECG is a noninvasive test designed to detect "late potentials." The effects of alterations in autonomic tone on the signal-averaged ECG have not been evaluated systematically. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of autonomic stimulation and blockade on the signal-averaged ECG were evaluated in 14 healthy subjects (8 men and 6 women; age, 28.5 +/- 4.8 years) on 2 separate days. The signal- averaged ECG was recorded at baseline and after physiological and pharmacologic beta-adrenergic stimulation (tilt, exercise, and epinephrine and isoproterenol infusions), sequential and combined beta- adrenergic and parasympathetic blockade, and alpha-adrenergic stimulation before and after parasympathetic blockade. Analysis was performed with a bidirectional filter (40-Hz high-pass). Significant changes in the signal-averaged QRS duration from baseline (105.1 +/- 12.0 milliseconds) were noted with tilt (96.8 +/- 8.8 milliseconds), tilt after double blockade (97.5 +/- 9.0 milliseconds), epinephrine (110.5 +/- 11.8 milliseconds), and isoproterenol (99.6 +/- 12.6 milliseconds). Changes in the root-mean-square voltage of the terminal 40 milliseconds and the low-amplitude (< 40 microV) signal duration paralleled the changes in the QRS duration. CONCLUSIONS: The signal- averaged ECG does not measure only "fixed" parameters but rather is altered under a variety of physiological and pharmacologic conditions. Upright tilt leads to shortening of the QRS duration before and after autonomic blockade; thus, the decrease in QRS duration with tilt may be related to factors other than changes in autonomic tone. These findings have implications for interpretation of the results of signal-averaged ECG.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Nahlawi, M. Waligora, S. M. Spies, R. O. Bonow, A. H. Kadish, and J. J. Goldberger
Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1883 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. Goldberger, S. Challapalli, M. Waligora, A. H. Kadish, D. A. Johnson, M. W. Ahmed, and S. Inbar
Uncertainty Principle of Signal-Averaged Electrocardiography
Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101(25): 2909 - 2915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Steinbigler, R. Haberl, C. Jeleazcov, A. Knez, U. Dorwarth, D. Muller, E. Hoffmann, and G. Steinbeck
Functional changes of ventricular late potentials by provocation with increase of heart rate: Evaluation during atrial pacing
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(2): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Nakagawa, T Iwao, S Ishida, H Yonemochi, T Fujino, T Saikawa, and M Ito
Circadian rhythm of the signal averaged electrocardiogram and its relation to heart rate variability in healthy subjects
Heart, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 493 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text]