Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1994;89:2710-2714

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by den Boer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roelandt, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by den Boer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roelandt, J. R.

Circulation, Vol 89, 2710-2714, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering

A den Boer, PJ de Feyter, WA Hummel, D Keane and JR Roelandt
University Hospital Rotterdam, Department of Cardiology, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic technology plays an integral role in interventional cardiology. The number of interventions continues to increase, and the associated radiation exposure to patients and personnel is of major concern. This study was undertaken to determine whether a newly developed x-ray tube deploying grid-switched pulsed fluoroscopy and extra beam filtering can achieve a reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining fluoroscopic images of high quality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three fluoroscopic techniques were compared: continuous fluoroscopy, pulsed fluoroscopy, and a newly developed high-output pulsed fluoroscopy with extra filtering. To ascertain differences in the quality of images and to determine differences in patient entrance and investigator radiation exposure, the radiated volume curve was measured to determine the required high voltage levels (kVpeak) for different object sizes for each fluoroscopic mode. The fluoroscopic data of 124 patient procedures were combined. The data were analyzed for radiographic projections, image intensifier field size, and x-ray tube kilovoltage levels (kVpeak). On the basis of this analysis, a reference procedure was constructed. The reference procedure was tested on a phantom or dummy patient by all three fluoroscopic modes. The phantom was so designed that the kilovoltage requirements for each projection were comparable to those needed for the average patient. Radiation exposure of the operator and patient was measured during each mode. The patient entrance dose was measured in air, and the operator dose was measured by 18 dosimeters on a dummy operator. Pulsed compared with continuous fluoroscopy could be performed with improved image quality at lower kilovoltages. The patient entrance dose was reduced by 21% and the operator dose by 54%. High-output pulsed fluoroscopy with extra beam filtering compared with continuous fluoroscopy improved the image quality, lowered the kilovoltage requirements, and reduced the patient entrance dose by 55% and the operator dose by 69%. CONCLUSIONS: High-output pulsed fluoroscopy with a grid-switched tube and extra filtering improves the image quality and significantly reduces both the operator dose and patient dose.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. D. Giordano, J. F. Baumhauer, T. L. Morgan, and G. R. Rechtine II
Patient and Surgeon Radiation Exposure: Comparison of Standard and Mini-C-Arm Fluoroscopy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2009; 91(2): 297 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. L. Ward, C. E. Barnewolt, K. J. Strauss, R. L. Lebowitz, V. Venkatakrishnan, M. Stehr, D. L. McLellan, C. A. Peters, D. Zurakowski, P. S. Dunning, et al.
Radiation Exposure Reduction during Voiding Cystourethrography in a Pediatric Porcine Model of Vesicoureteral Reflux
Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 96 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. Papadopoulou, Em. Yakoumakis, P. Sandilos, V. Thanopoulos, Tr. Makri, G. Gialousis, D. Houndas, N. Yakoumakis, and Ev. Georgiou
Entrance radiation doses during paediatric cardiac catheterisations performed for diagnosis or the treatment of congenital heart disease
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Trianni, R. Padovani, C. Foti, E. Cragnolini, G. Chizzola, H. Toh, G. Bernardi, and A. Proclemer
Dose to cardiologists in haemodynamic and electrophysiology cardiac interventional procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Geijer, T Larzon, R Popek, and K-W Beckman
Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 906 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D G W Onnasch, A Schemm, and H-H Kramer
Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2004; 77(918): 479 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. Koenig, F. A. Mettler, and L. K. Wagner
Skin Injuries from Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures: Part 2, Review of 73 Cases and Recommendations for Minimizing Dose Delivered to Patient
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 13 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E Vano, L Gonzalez, J I Ten, J M Fernandez, E Guibelalde, and C Macaya
Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(877): 48 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]