Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1994;90:2820-2826

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jentzer, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jentzer, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.

Circulation, Vol 90, 2820-2826, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Analysis of junctional ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

JH Jentzer, R Goyal, BD Williamson, KC Man, M Niebauer, E Daoud, SA Strickberger, JD Hummel and F Morady
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.

BACKGROUND: Junctional ectopy may occur during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The purpose of the present study was to characterize this junctional ectopy quantitatively. METHODS AND RESULTS: The subjects of this study were 52 consecutive patients with AVNRT who underwent slow pathway ablation and 5 additional patients included retrospectively because they had developed high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block during the procedure. A combined anatomic and electrogram mapping approach was used for slow pathway ablation, and AVNRT was successfully eliminated in all patients. In the group of 52 consecutive patients, the incidence of junctional ectopy was significantly higher during 52 effective applications of RF energy than during 366 ineffective applications (100% versus 65%, P < .001). Compared with ineffective RF energy applications, successful RF energy applications had a significantly longer duration of individual bursts of junctional ectopy (7.1 +/- 7.1 versus 5.0 +/- 7.0 seconds [+/- SD], P < .05), a greater total number of junctional beats during the applications (24 +/- 16 versus 15 +/- 8, P < .01), and a greater total span of time during which junctional ectopy occurred (19 +/- 15 versus 11 +/- 12 seconds, P < .01). Four of the 52 patients plus an additional 5 patients developed transient AV block lasting 34 +/- 37 seconds. In 1 of the 9 patients who had transient AV block, third-degree AV nodal block requiring a permanent pacemaker recurred 2 weeks later. In each of the 9 patients who developed AV block, there was ventriculoatrial (VA) block in association with junctional ectopy during the RF energy application immediately preceding the AV block. Among 48 patients who did not develop AV block, 17 patients had at least one episode of VA block during junctional ectopy. The positive predictive value of VA block during junctional ectopy for the development of AV block was 19% in the consecutive series of 52 patients. Among 31 patients who always had 1:1 VA conduction in association with junctional ectopy, 12 had poor VA conduction in the baseline state, with a VA block cycle length of at least 500 milliseconds during ventricular pacing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AVNRT undergoing slow pathway ablation, junctional ectopy during the application of RF energy is a sensitive but nonspecific marker of successful ablation. The bursts of junctional ectopy are significantly longer at effective target sites than at ineffective sites. VA conduction should be expected during the junctional ectopy that accompanies slow pathway ablation, even when there is poor VA conduction during baseline ventricular pacing. VA block during junctional ectopy is a harbinger of AV block in patients undergoing RF ablation of the slow pathway. If energy applications are discontinued as soon as VA block occurs, the risk of AV block may be markedly reduced.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Fujiki, T. Sakamoto, M. Sakabe, T. Tsuneda, M. Sugao, Y. Nakatani, K. Mizumaki, and H. Inoue
Junctional rhythm associated with ventriculoatrial block during slow pathway ablation in atypical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
Europace, June 9, 2008; (2008) eun151v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Nakagawa and W. M. Jackman
Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2465 - 2478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. De Sisti, J. Tonet, N. Barakett, J. Lacotte, J.F. Leclercq, and R. Frank
Transvenous cryo-ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a single-centre initial experience study
Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Z. Iakobishvili, J. Kusniec, R. Shohat-Zabarsky, A. Mazur, A. Battler, and B. Strasberg
Junctional rhythm quantity and duration during slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entry supraventricular tachycardia
Europace, August 1, 2006; 8(8): 588 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Zrenner, J. Dong, J. Schreieck, I. Deisenhofer, H. Estner, B. Luani, M. Karch, and C. Schmitt
Transvenous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a prospective randomized pilot study
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2004; 25(24): 2226 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. E. McNulty, B. Kline, J. Welsh, and R. Bartkowski
Radiofrequency Transmission to Monitoring Devices in the Operating Room: A Simulation Study
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K J Lipscomb, A M Zaidi, A P Fitzpatrick, and D LEFROY
Slow pathway modification for atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia: fast junctional tachycardia predicts adverse prognosis
Heart, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 44 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. C. Skanes, M. Dubuc, G. J. Klein, B. Thibault, A. D. Krahn, R. Yee, D. Roy, P. Guerra, and M. Talajic
Cryothermal Ablation of the Slow Pathway for the Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Circulation, December 5, 2000; 102(23): 2856 - 2860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J-L Lin, S K S Huang, L-P Lai, L-J Lin, J-H Chen, Y-Z Tseng, and W-P Lien
Distal end of the atrioventricular nodal artery predicts the risk of atrioventricular block during slow pathway catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
Heart, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 543 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Kanter, J. Papagiannis, M. P. Carboni, R. M. Ungerleider, W. E. Sanders, and J. M. Wharton
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia substrates after mustard and senning operations for d-transposition of the great arteries
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2000; 35(2): 428 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. Morady
Radio-Frequency Ablation as Treatment for Cardiac Arrhythmias
N. Engl. J. Med., February 18, 1999; 340(7): 534 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Yoshida, H. Ikeda, T. Hiraki, I. Kubara, M. Ohga, and T. Imaizumi
Detection of concealed left sided accessory atrioventricular pathway by P wave signal averaged electrocardiogram
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.-H. Hsieh, S.-A. Chen, C.-T. Tai, W.-C. Yu, Y.-J. Chen, and M.-S. Chang
Absence of Junctional Rhythm During Successful Slow-Pathway Ablation in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Circulation, November 24, 1998; 98(21): 2296 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F GAITA, R RICCARDI, and L CALO
Importance and implications of the occurrence of AV block following radiofrequency ablation
Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 534 - 535.
[Full Text]