Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:445-450

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alt, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alt, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CARBON
*CARBON BLACK
*TITANIUM

(Circulation. 1995;91:445-450.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Improved Defibrillation Threshold With a New Epicardial Carbon Electrode Compared With a Standard Epicardial Titanium Patch

Presented in part at the 66th Annual American Heart Association Meeting, November 1993.

Eckhard U. Alt, MD; Parwis C. Fotuhi, MD; Richard L. Callihan, MD; Dennis L. Rollins, MSEE; Edgar Mestre, MD; Marty P. Combs, BSE; William M. Smith, PhD; Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Medicine (R.L.C., W.M.S., R.E.I.) and Pathology (D.L.R., R.E.I.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies, the Department of Biomedical Engineering of the School of Engineering (W.M.S., R.E.I), Duke University, Durham, NC; and the I. Medical Clinic (E.U.A., E.M., M.P.C), Technische Universität Munich, Germany.

Correspondence to Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Volker Hall Room G82A, Box 201, Birmingham, AL 35294.

Background Recent studies show that depending on the type of shock morphology used, 5% to 15% of patients requiring implantable defibrillators cannot be treated with a nonthoracotomy system. In these cases, an epicardial patch–based system becomes necessary. In this study, we investigated a newly developed epicardial carbon electrode as an alternative to a standard epicardial titanium patch.

Methods and Results A tubular epicardial braided carbon electrode of 7F diameter and 14-cm length applied in a U-shape to the epicardium was compared with a standard left ventricular epicardial 15-cm2 titanium mesh patch (CPI Inc). As cathode, a CPI endocardial lead, a Medtronic lead, or a carbon-platinum-iridium prototype electrode was used. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with a 60-Hz generator and allowed to continue for 10 seconds before a shock was given. Two different biphasic shock waveforms (3.2/2- and 6/6-millisecond) were delivered by the six electrode configurations. Eight dogs (weight, 24.5±1.3 kg) underwent an up-down defibrillation protocol. The order of testing the epicardial electrodes, the endocardial cathodes, and the waveform was randomized. With the epicardial carbon electrode, the mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) energy decreased 39% to 56% and the voltage decreased 24% to 35% compared with the titanium patch: from 8.3±2.5 to 4.9±3.6 J with the CPI lead and the 3.2/2-millisecond waveform, from 6.2±2.5 to 2.9±2.1 J with the carbon-platinum-iridium prototype, and from 6.4±3.4 J to 3.5±2.6 J with the Medtronic lead (P<=.05). The DFT determinations with the 6/6-millisecond biphasic waveform showed a similar trend with slightly higher values.

Conclusions Compared with a titanium patch, the new braided epicardial electrode significantly decreases the defibrillation energy requirements. This effect can be maximized by using an endocardial carbon-platinum-iridium prototype as cathode and a short duration biphasic waveform.


Key Words: electrodes • defibrillation • epicardial patches




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Gradaus, D. Bocker, A. Dorszewski, B. Lamp, D. Hammel, G. Breithardt, and M. Block
Fractally coated defibrillation electrodes: Is an improvement in defibrillation threshold possible?
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 154 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Windecker, R. E. Ideker, V. J. Plumb, G. N. Kay, G. P. Walcott, and A. E. Epstein
The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]