Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:685-690

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leenen, F. H.H.
Right arrow Articles by Fourney, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leenen, F. H.H.
Right arrow Articles by Fourney, A.

(Circulation. 1995;91:685-690.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Role of Cardiac ß2-Receptors in Cardiac Responses to Exercise in Cardiac Transplant Patients

Frans H.H. Leenen, MD, PhD, FRCPC; Ross A. Davies, MD, FRCPC; Anne Fourney, RN

From the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Frans H.H. Leenen, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Hypertension Unit, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, H360, 40 Ruskin St, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9.

Background In healthy human hearts, ß2-receptor–mediated chronotropic and inotropic responses contribute to the cardiac responses to ß-agonists. A (patho)physiological relevance for ß2-receptor–mediated responses has so far not been demonstrated, in part because ß1-receptor–mediated responses to cardiac neuronally released norepinephrine can mask ß2-receptor–mediated responses.

Methods and Results In the present study, we evaluated the blood pressure and heart rate responses to bicycle exercise in cardiac transplant patients (n=7) compared with patients with essential hypertension (n=8) on placebo and two doses of the ß1-selective ß-blocker atenolol (25 and 50 mg/d) and the nonselective ß-blocker nadolol (20 and 40 mg/d), each dose for 1 week using a double-blind, randomized, crossover design. Exercise was performed 3 hours after dosing, using a stepwise increase in load until exhaustion. Exercise performance was less in the transplant patients and significantly further (25%) decreased by nadolol. Exercise caused equivalent increases in plasma norepinephrine in the two groups, but more marked increases in plasma epinephrine in the transplant patients despite less exercise. In the essential hypertension patients, systolic blood pressure increased by 80 mm Hg on placebo and 60 mm Hg on either blocker. The increase in heart rate (by about 75 beats per minute) was inhibited by 10% and 20% by the lower and higher doses, respectively, similar for the two blockers. In contrast, in the transplant patients, systolic blood pressure increased by 60 mm Hg on placebo, but this increase was totally blocked by either blocker. The heart rate increase (by 50 beats per minute on placebo) was blunted (dose related) by either blocker but 50% more by nadolol versus atenolol.

Conclusions The present study shows that cardiac ß2-receptors contribute to a clear extent to the heart rate responses to endogenous circulating catecholamines in the absence of cardiac neuronally released norepinephrine. Nonselective ß-blockade probably is less well tolerated in cardiac transplant patients compared with ß1-selective blockade.


Key Words: receptors • heart rate • exercise




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
L. U. Nwakanma, A. S. Shah, J. V. Conte, and W. A. Baumgartner
Heart Transplantation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1539 - 1578.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. M. Bengel, P. Ueberfuhr, J. Karja, K. Schreiber, S. G. Nekolla, B. Reichart, and M. Schwaiger
Sympathetic reinnervation, exercise performance and effects of {beta}-adrenergic blockade in cardiac transplant recipients
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2004; 25(19): 1726 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. M. Bengel, P. Ueberfuhr, N. Schiepel, S. G. Nekolla, B. Reichart, and M. Schwaiger
Effect of Sympathetic Reinnervation on Cardiac Performance after Heart Transplantation
N. Engl. J. Med., September 6, 2001; 345(10): 731 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Christini, J. Walden, and J. M. Edelberg
Direct biologically based biosensing of dynamic physiological function
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): H2006 - H2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
O.-E. Brodde and M. C. Michel
Adrenergic and Muscarinic Receptors in the Human Heart
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 51(4): 651 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. E. Newton, E. R. Azevedo, and J. D. Parker
Inotropic and Sympathetic Responses to the Intracoronary Infusion of a ß2-Receptor Agonist : A Human In Vivo Study
Circulation, May 11, 1999; 99(18): 2402 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]