This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walker, A. M. Articles by Dreyer, N. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walker, A. M. Articles by Dreyer, N. A.

(Circulation. 1995;92:3235-3239.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Patient Factors Associated With Strut Fracture in Björk-Shiley 60° Convexo-Concave Heart Valves

Alexander M. Walker, MD, DRPH; Donnie P. Funch, PhD; Sandra I. Sulsky, MPH; Nancy A. Dreyer, PhD

From Epidemiology Resources, Inc, Newton Lower Falls, Mass (A.M.W., D.P.F., S.I.S., N.A.D.) and the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (A.M.W.).

Background Previously established predictors of outlet strut fracture in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (CC) valves include larger valve size, larger opening angle (70° versus 60°), younger age at implant, and date of manufacture. We sought to identify patient characteristics that might be predictive of strut fracture and to refine the estimates associated with previously identified predictors.

Methods and Results We conducted a case-control study of CC60° valves implanted in the United States and Canada and manufactured between January 1, 1979, and March 31, 1984. Cases included all valves with verified outlet strut fractures reported to the manufacturer from January 1979 through January 1992. Up to 10 controls were selected for each case. Control valves were matched according to implanting surgeon and were required to have been functioning at least as long as their matched case valves. Case and control medical records were reviewed for information on patient medical history before the valve implant. There were 96 case and 634 control valves for which clinical data were available. Patient age and valve size and implant position were confirmed as important determinants of fracture. There was a strong inverse gradient of risk with age. The risk of fracture was 42% lower for each 10-year increment of patient age at time of implant. Large mitral valves were at greatest risk of strut fracture, with the largest mitral valves (33 mm) estimated to be 33 times more likely to fracture than the smallest (21 to 25 mm) aortic valves. Date of manufacture was also associated with risk; valves welded from mid-1981 through March 1984 were more likely to fracture than those manufactured in 1979 and 1980. Body surface area <1.5 m² was associated with 1/16 the risk of body surface area 2.0 m². No other patient factor was strongly associated with the risk of strut fracture.

Conclusions Few patient features identifiable in the implant record are predictive of strut fracture. Our analysis supports previous work in identifying valve size, patient age, and date of manufacture as predictors of fracture and adds body surface area. A number of these associations suggest that conditions associated with higher cardiac output may also place patients at increased risk.

Key Words: defects • epidemiology • risk factors • surgery • valves

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. H. Blackstone Could It Happen Again?: The Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart Valve Story Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2717 - 2719. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Blot, M. A. Ibrahim, T. D. Ivey, D. E. Acheson, R. Brookmeyer, A. Weyman, J. Defauw, J. K. Smith, and D. Harrison Twenty-Five-Year Experience With the Bjork-Shiley Convexoconcave Heart Valve: A Continuing Clinical Concern Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2850 - 2857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. van Gorp, Y. van der Graaf, B. A. J. M. de Mol, C. J. G. Bakker, T. D. Witkamp, L. M. P. Ramos, and W. P. T. M. Mali Bjork-Shiley Convexoconcave Valves: Susceptibility Artifacts at Brain MR Imaging and Mechanical Valve Fractures Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 709 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Z. Omar, L. S. Morton, S. Murad, and K. M. Taylor Use of flexibility tests in the manufacturing process of 60{degrees} bjork-shiley convexo-concave valves and the risk of outlet strut fracture J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 832 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Morton, S Murad, R Z Omar, and K Taylor Importance of emergency identification schemes Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2002; 19(6): 584 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Z Omar, L S Morton, D A Halliday, E M Danns, M T Beirne, W J Blot, and K M Taylor Outlet strut fracture of Bjork-Shiley convexo concave heart valves: the UK cohort study Heart, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Z. Omar, L. S. Morton, M. Beirne, W. J. Blot, P. V. Lawford, R. Hose, and K. M. Taylor Outlet strut fracture of Bjork-Shiley convexo-concave valves: Can valve-manufacturing characteristics explain the risk? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2001; 121(6): 1143 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. W. Steyerberg, M. Kallewaard, Y. Van Der Graaf, L. A. Van Herwerden, and J.D. F. Habbema Decision Analyses for Prophylactic Replacement of the Bjork-Shiley Convexo-concave Heart Valve:: An Evaluation of Assumptions and Estimates Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 20 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kallewaard, A. Algra, J. Defauw, Y. v. d. Graaf, and for the Bjork-Shiley Study Group WHICH MANUFACTURING CHARACTERISTICS ARE PREDICTORS OF OUTLET STRUT FRACTURE IN LARGE SIXTY-DEGREE BJÖRK-SHILEY CONVEXO-CONCAVE MITRAL VALVES? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1999; 117(4): 766 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]