This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oz, M. C. Articles by Levin, H. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Oz, M. C. Articles by Levin, H. R.

(Circulation. 1995;92:169-173.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Screening Scale Predicts Patients Successfully Receiving Long-term Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Mehmet C. Oz, MD; Daniel J. Goldstein, MD; Paolo Pepino, MD; Alan D. Weinberg, MS; Seth M. Thompson, PhD; Katherine A. Catanese, RN; Rita L. Vargo, MSN, RN; Patrick M. McCarthy, MD; Eric A. Rose, MD; Howard R. Levin, MD

From the Departments of Surgery and Circulatory Physiology (H.R.L.), College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.L.V., P.M.M.), Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Mehmet C. Oz, MD, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Milstein 7-435, New York, NY 10032.

Background Although use of long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is becoming more popular, further reduction of the mortality rate accompanying device insertion through improved patient selection would make this alternative even more appealing. We sought to develop a scoring system that was based on criteria obtainable at the time of evaluation and predictive of successful early outcome and simple to apply.

Methods and Results Patients (n=56) undergoing LVAD insertion between 1990 and 1994 were screened for easily obtainable preoperative risk factors. To test the association between survival and each risk factor, a ² analysis was performed, and relative risks were estimated. Oliguria, ventilator dependence, elevated central venous pressure, elevated prothrombin time, and reoperation status had low probability values and high estimated relative risks. On the basis of these relations, a risk factor–selection scale (RFSS) (range, 0 to 10) was developed by computing appropriate weights for each risk factor. The distribution of patients for each scale score reveal that with RFSS 5, most device recipients will die (P<.001). The average RFSS (±SD) of survivors (n=42) was 2.45±1.73 compared with 5.43±2.85 in nonsurvivors (n=14) (P<.0001). Univariate logistical regression was also significant (score statistic, 16.2; df=1; P=.001).

Conclusions The RFSS is simple, easy to apply, and statistically valid. Physicians could use the scale as a starting point in discussing the suitability for LVAD implantation in a specific patient and as a basis for comparing patient outcomes.

Key Words: heart failure • risk factors • mortality • heart-assist device

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Aggarwal, F. Cheema, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1609 - 1628. [Full Text]

				R. John, K. Liao, K. Lietz, F. Kamdar, M. Colvin-Adams, A. Boyle, L. Miller, and L. Joyce Experience with the Levitronix CentriMag circulatory support system as a bridge to decision in patients with refractory acute cardiogenic shock and multisystem organ failure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 351 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Martin, M. P. Siegenthaler, O. Friesewinkel, T. Fader, A. van de Loo, G. Trummer, M. Berchtold-Herz, and F. Beyersdorf Implantable left ventricular assist device for treatment of pulmonary hypertension in candidates for orthotopic heart transplantation--a preliminary study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 971 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Morgan, R. John, B. J. Lee, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post-transplant mortality Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 859 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Aaronson, H. Patel, and F. D. Pagani Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(90060): S29 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Kukuy, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1491 - 1506. [Full Text]

				V. Rao, J. P. Slater, N. M. Edwards, Y. Naka, and M. C. Oz Surgical management of valvular disease in patients requiring left ventricular assist device support Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1448 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. D. Pagani, K. D. Aaronson, F. Swaniker, and R. H. Bartlett The use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients with primary cardiac failure as a bridge to implantable left ventricular assist device Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S77 - S81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Gronda and E. Vitali Left ventricle assist systems: a possible alternative to heart transplantation for heart failure patients? Patient selection, techniques and benefit Eur J Heart Fail, December 17, 1999; 1(4): 319 - 325. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Sun, K. A. Catanese, T. B. Spanier, M. R. Flannery, M. T. Gardocki, L. S. Marcus, H. R. Levin, E. A. Rose, and M. C. Oz 100 long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia Presbyterian interim experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 688 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]