| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1996;93:91-98.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the VA Medical Center/Duke University, Durham, NC; the Sinai Samaritan Medical Center/St Luke's Hospital, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (Wis) Clinical Campus; and Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex.
Correspondence to Andrea Natale, MD, VA Medical Center/Duke University, 508 Fulton St, Box 111A, Durham, NC 27705.
Background The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze redetection problems after unsuccessful shock with different lead systems and devices.
Methods and Results We prospectively analyzed
detection and redetection characteristics among transvenous implantable
cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) using standard bipolar and
integrated bipolar sensing. Monophasic and biphasic ICDs were included.
Subthreshold shocks were intentionally delivered, and redetection of
ventricular fibrillation (VF) was assessed before discharge
and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months later. Sensing of VF resulting from
antitachycardia pacing and low-energy cardioversion (
2 J)
also was analyzed. Before inclusion in the study, each patient
underwent subthreshold shock testing at three different time intervals.
Among the 160 ICDs with standard bipolar sensing, 530 VF inductions
were analyzed. After the failed shocks, undersensing was more
frequent (3% versus 20%, P<.01) but did not remarkably
prolong redetection (3.1±0.8 versus 3.3±1.1 seconds). Among the
201
ICDs with integrated bipolar sensing, 80 were connected to a CPI device
(60 Ventak 1600Endotak 60 series and 20 PRx II 1715Endotak 70
series) and 121 to the Ventritex defibrillator (91 Endotak 60 series,
14 TVL systems, and 16 Endotak 70 series). After 252 failed shocks,
redetection was prolonged with the CPI system (3.1±1.4 versus
4.6±3.6
seconds, P<.05) but did not change after 396 failed shocks
with the Ventritex ICD (5.4±1.9 versus 4.9±2.2 seconds). This
may
reflect different nominal settings for detection and redetection. In 9
of 121 patients with Ventritex and 1 of 80 with the CPI ICDs, the
devices failed to redetect VF. However, redetection malfunction was
never observed in patients with integrated bipolar systems with >6-mm
electrode separation. After antitachycardia pacing in 1 patient
and a 2-J shock in 1 patient, ventricular
tachycardia turned into VF, which was undetected. Both patients
used the Endotak 60 seriesCadence combination. None of the patients
showing VF undersensing had sudden death at follow-up. Only 3 of
the 12 patients with sensing malfunction were on
antiarrhythmia drugs at the time of testing.
Analysis of endocardial electrograms showed that failure to
redetect VF is not associated with a uniform reduction but with a rapid
and repetitive change of electrogram amplitude.
Conclusions Standard bipolar sensing redetects VF more effectively than integrated bipolar sensing. Endocardial electrogram analysis provides insights into the understanding of the mechanism of undersensing, and certain lead-device combinations result in a higher occurrence of VF undersensing. The clinical relevance of this phenomenon remains unknown.
Key Words: defibrillation fibrillation death, sudden
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. D. Swerdlow Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillators Without Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation Circulation, May 1, 2001; 103(17): 2159 - 2164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |