Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;93:712-719

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartunek, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Bruyne, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartunek, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Bruyne, B.

(Circulation. 1996;93:712-719.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Abnormal Systolic Intraventricular Flow Velocities After Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

Mechanisms, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Significance

Presented in part at the 67th Scientific Session of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Tex, November 14-17; and previously published in abstract form (Circulation. 1994;90[pt 2]:I-225).

Jozef Bartunek, MD; Stanislas U. Sys, MD, PhD; Ana Clara Rodrigues, MD; Eddy Van Schuerbeeck, RN; Linda Mortier, RN; Bernard de Bruyne, MD, PhD

From the Cardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.

Correspondence to Bernard de Bruyne, MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, Moorselbaan, 164 B-9300 Aalst, Belgium.

Background Dynamic intraventricular flow velocities after valve replacement for aortic stenosis have been associated with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. The aims of the present study were to determine the mechanisms and preoperative predictors of abnormal flow velocity (AFV) after valve replacement for aortic stenosis and to assess the clinical course of patients with AFV after surgery.

Methods and Results One hundred consecutive patients with pure aortic stenosis were studied prospectively before operation by cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. After surgery, intraventricular flow was studied by Doppler echocardiography at rest, during nipride infusion, and during dobutamine infusion. AFV (defined as a systolic dagger-shaped Doppler spectrum >2 m/s) occurred in 14 patients at rest and in 27 patients during nipride and/or dobutamine infusion. In most patients, AFV was associated with left ventricular cavity squeezing. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, preoperative intraventricular flow velocity and septal-to-posterior wall thickness ratio by Doppler echocardiography, and mean transvalvular pressure gradient and ejection fraction by catheterization emerged as predictors of resting postoperative AFV. Patients with resting AFV had a higher incidence of dyspnea or hypotension (64% versus 21%, P<.01) and a longer hospital stay (13.1±5.8 versus 11.1±2.5, P<.05) than patients without AFV. In contrast, at a 1-year follow-up, no patient with resting AFV died.

Conclusions First, AFV occurs in 14% of patients at rest after valve replacement for aortic stenosis and can be provoked or worsened by ventricular unloading or inotropic stimulation. Second, AFV is related more frequently to cavity squeezing than to systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve apparatus. Third, a typical pattern (small, hyperdynamic, and asymmetrically hypertrophied ventricle) is predictive for postoperative AFV and should be taken into account for the postoperative management. Finally, the presence of AFV at rest is associated with high in-hospital morbidity but good long-term prognosis.


Key Words: blood flow • hypertrophy • inotropic agents • stenosis • valves




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Jorgensen, O. Bech-Hanssen, E. Houltz, and S.-E. Ricksten
Effects of Levosimendan on Left Ventricular Relaxation and Early Filling at Maintained Preload and Afterload Conditions After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, February 26, 2008; 117(8): 1075 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Borger, A. F. Nette, M. Maganti, and C. M. Feindel
Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Valve Versus Medtronic Hancock II: A Matched Hemodynamic Comparison
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2054 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
T. Routledge and S. A.M. Nashef
Severe mitral systolic anterior motion complicating aortic valve replacement
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2005; 4(5): 486 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Maslow, M. M. Regan, C. Schwartz, A. Bert, and A. Singh
Inotropes Improve Right Heart Function in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 891 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. V. Milani, C. J. Lavie, Y. E. Gilliland, M. M. Cassidy, and J. A. Bernal
Overview of Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Chest Physician
Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 1081 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Bech-Hanssen, I. Wallentin, E. Houltz, M. Beckman Suurkula, S. Larsson, and K. Caidahl
Gender differences in patients with severe aortic stenosis: impact on preoperative left ventricular geometry and function, as well as early postoperative morbidity and mortality
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 15(1): 24 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]