(Circulation. 1996;94:2424-2428.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Incidence and Clinical Relevance of the Occurrence of Bundle-Branch Block in Patients Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy
Duke University/VA Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Correspondence to Andrea Natale, MD, VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton St, Box 111A, Durham, NC 27705.
Background Whether thrombolytic therapy alters the incidence and clinical outcome of bundle-branch block is unclear.
Methods and Results We examined the occurrence of new-onset bundle-branch block, both transient and persistent, in 681 patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction 9 and Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Arteries 1 protocols. Each patient underwent continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring for 36 to 72 hours with the Mortara ST monitoring system. Bundle-branch block was characterized as right, left, alternating, transient, or persistent. The overall incidence of bundle-branch block was 23.6% (n=161), with transient block in 18.4% (n=125) and persistent block in 5.3% (n=36). Right bundle-branch block was found in 13% (n=89) of the population; left bundle-branch block was found in 7% (n=48). Alternating bundle-branch block was seen in 3.5% (n=24) of patients. Left anterior descending artery infarcts accounted for most bundles (54%, n=79). Patients with bundle-branch block had lower ejection fractions, higher peak creatine phosphokinase levels (P<.0001), and more diseased vessels (P<.019). Mortality rates in patients with and without bundle-branch block were 8.7% and 3.5%, respectively (P<.007). A higher mortality rate was observed in the presence of persistent (19.4%) versus transient (5.6%) or no (3.5%) bundle-branch block (P<.001).
Conclusions Thrombolytic therapy reduces the overall mortality rate associated with persistent bundle-branch block. However, persistent bundle-branch block remains predictive of a higher mortality rate than either transient or no bundle-branch block. Continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring provides an accurate characterization of the incidence and type of conduction disturbances after acute myocardial infarction.
Key Words: bundle-branch block • myocardial infarction • conduction • mortality • thrombolysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  Authors/Task Force Members, F. Van de Werf, J. Bax, A. Betriu, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, F. Crea, V. Falk, G. Filippatos, K. Fox, K. Huber, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology: Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2008; 29(23): 2909 - 2945. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 959 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2256 - 2295. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bauer, M. A. Watanabe, P. Barthel, R. Schneider, K. Ulm, and G. Schmidt QRS duration and late mortality in unselected post-infarction patients of the revascularization era Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2006; 27(4): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-K. Wong, R. A.H. Stewart, W. Gao, J. K. French, C. Raffel, H. D. White, and for the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Eriksson, L. Wilhelmsen, and A. Rosengren Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years: The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2005; 26(21): 2300 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A D Reuben and C J Mann Simplifying thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 617 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. J. Haywood Left Bundle Branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Benign or Malignant? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 39 - 41. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Tomoda and N. Aoki Right Bundle Branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting Angiology, March 1, 2005; 56(2): 131 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Stenestrand, F. Tabrizi, J. Lindback, A. Englund, M. Rosenqvist, and L. Wallentin Comorbidity and Myocardial Dysfunction Are the Main Explanations for the Higher 1-Year Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Left Bundle-Branch Block Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 1896 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Alcolea, T. Jarry-Guichard, J. de Bakker, D. Gonzalez, W. Lamers, S. Coppen, L. Barrio, H. Jongsma, D. Gros, and H. van Rijen Replacement of Connexin40 by Connexin45 in the Mouse: Impact on Cardiac Electrical Conduction Circ. Res., January 9, 2004; 94(1): 100 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Crow, P. J. Hannan, and A. R. Folsom Prognostic Significance of Corrected QT and Corrected JT Interval for Incident Coronary Heart Disease in a General Population Sample Stratified by Presence or Absence of Wide QRS Complex: The ARIC Study With 13 Years of Follow-Up Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1985 - 1989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S J Maynard, I B A Menown, G Manoharan, J Allen, J McC Anderson, and A A J Adgey Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 998 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Zimetbaum and M. E. Josephson Use of the Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., March 6, 2003; 348(10): 933 - 940. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. V. M. van Rijen, T. A. B. van Veen, M. J. A. van Kempen, F. J. G. Wilms-Schopman, M. Potse, O. Krueger, K. Willecke, T. Opthof, H. J. Jongsma, and J. M. T. de Bakker Impaired Conduction in the Bundle Branches of Mouse Hearts Lacking the Gap Junction Protein Connexin40 Circulation, March 20, 2001; 103(11): 1591 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Shlipak, A. S. Go, P. D. Frederick, J. Malmgren, H. V. Barron, J. G. Canto, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Treatment and outcomes of left bundle-branch block patients with myocardial infarction who present without chest pain J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 706 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. G. Shlipak, W. L. Lyons, A. S. Go, T. M. Chou, G. T. Evans, and W. S. Browner Should the Electrocardiogram Be Used to Guide Therapy for Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block and Suspected Myocardial Infarction? JAMA, February 24, 1999; 281(8): 714 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Eriksson, P.-O. Hansson, H. Eriksson, and M. Dellborg Bundle-Branch Block in a General Male Population : The Study of Men Born 1913 Circulation, December 1, 1998; 98(22): 2494 - 2500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|