This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stambler, B. S. Articles by Ellenbogen, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stambler, B. S. Articles by Ellenbogen, K. A.

(Circulation. 1996;94:2515-2525.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Elucidating the Mechanisms of Atrial Flutter Cycle Length Variability Using Power Spectral Analysis Techniques

Bruce S. Stambler, MD; Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD

the Division of Cardiology (B.S.S.), West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, West Roxbury, Mass; and the Division of Cardiology (K.A.E.), McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond.

Correspondence to Bruce S. Stambler, MD, Cardiology (111A), West Roxbury VA Medical Center, 1400 VFW Pkwy, West Roxbury, MA 02132.

Background The mechanism of the small beat-to-beat variations in cycle length of atrial flutter in humans has not been fully explained. We investigated the beat-to-beat control of atrial flutter cycle length using time and frequency analysis techniques.

Methods and Results Mean, SD, and power spectra of atrial cycle lengths were calculated from atrial recordings in 28 patients with type I atrial flutter. In control patients, mean and SD values of atrial cycle length were 265±37 and 4.9±1.7 ms. Power spectra contained two or three major peaks with 10.6±9.2% in band 1 (0.0 to 0.18 Hz), 26.7±15.9% in band 2 (0.18 to 0.6 Hz), and 63.1±17.7% in band 3 (0.6 to 2.2 Hz). Isoproterenol infusion (n=8) increased percentage of total power in band 1 (7.1±5.6% to 25.7±18.9%, P<.001). Percentage of total power in band 1 was less in patients receiving (n=5) versus not receiving (n=18) oral ß-blockers (2.2±1.9% versus 10.6±9.2%, P=.003). Standard deviation (2.5±1.3 versus 4.9±1.7 ms, P=.009) and total power (2025±1350 versus 9768±8874 ms², P=.005) were less in heart transplant recipients (n=5) than control patients. Increases in respiratory rate (n=6) shifted band 2 frequency peak to higher frequencies (0.26±0.13 to 0.38±0.18 Hz, P<.05). Atrial cycle length was longer and monophasic action potential duration was shorter during inspiration than during expiration. Band 3 frequency peak was correlated with heart rate (r=.797, P<.0001).

Conclusions Atrial flutter cycle length variability has an underlying periodic pattern that is detected by spectral analysis. Atrial flutter is modulated on a beat-to-beat basis by an interplay between the autonomic nervous and respiratory systems and the ventricular rate.

Key Words: atrial flutter • nervous system, autonomic • respiration

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mase, M. Disertori, and F. Ravelli Cardiorespiratory interactions in patients with atrial flutter J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 29 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Hoppe, A. M. Kahn, G. K. Feld, A. Hassankhani, and S. M. Narayan Separating Atrial Flutter From Atrial Fibrillation With Apparent Electrocardiographic Organization Using Dominant and Narrow F-Wave Spectra J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2079 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ravelli, B. S. Stambler, and K. A. Ellenbogen Atrial Flutter Cycle Length Oscillations and Role of the Autonomic Nervous System • Response Circulation, August 11, 1998; 98(6): 607 - 608. [Full Text] [PDF]