Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;94:151-157

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bocker, D.
Right arrow Articles by Breithardt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bocker, D.
Right arrow Articles by Breithardt, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Pacemakers and Implantable Defibrillators

(Circulation. 1996;94:151-157.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Comparison of d,l-Sotalol and Implantable Defibrillators for Treatment of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Dirk Bocker, MD; Wilhelm Haverkamp, MD; Michael Block, MD; Martin Borggrefe, MD; Dieter Hammel, MD; Gunter Breithardt, MD

Westfalische Wilhelms-University, Department of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Surgery (D.H.), and the Institute for Research in Arteriosclerosis, Munster, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Dirk Bocker, Universitatsklinik Munster, Innere Medizin C, D-48129 Munster, Germany.

Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and d,l-sotalol are widely used to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of d,l-sotalol and ICDs in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods and Results In a case-control study, 50 patients treated with oral d,l-sotalol were matched to 50 patients treated with ICDs. Both groups were matched for sex (82 men), age (58±10 years), ejection fraction (40±12%), extent of coronary artery disease, presenting arrhythmia, and year that treatment began. In all patients in the sotalol group, VT/VF was inducible in the drug-free electrophysiological study. Induction of sustained VT/VF was suppressed by d,l-sotalol (438±95 mg/d). In the ICD group, either VT/VF was not inducible (n=5) or inducible sustained VT/VF was refractory to antiarrhythmic drug treatment (n=45). Sotalol treatment led to a marked reduction in arrhythmic events. Whereas 83% of the patients in the sotalol group were free of sudden death and nonfatal VT at 3 years, only 33% of the ICD patients did not receive appropriate ICD therapies (P<.005). Actuarial rates for absence of sudden death at 3 years were 85% in the sotalol group and 100% in the ICD group (P<.005). Actuarial rates for overall survival at 3 years were 75% in the sotalol group and 85% in the ICD group (P=.02).

Conclusions In this case-control study, ICD therapy was more effective than electrophysiologically guided antiarrhythmic treatment with d,l-sotalol in prevention of sudden death and reduction of total mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.


Key Words: tachyarrhythmias • sotalol • defibrillation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Committee Members, G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2002; 40(9): 1703 - 1719.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, M. J. Silka, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2145 - 2161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S.G. Priori, E. Aliot, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, L. Bossaert, G. Breithardt, P. Brugada, A.J. Camm, R. Cappato, S.M. Cobbe, C. Di Mario, et al.
Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1374 - 1450.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R.N.W. Hauer, E. Aliot, M. Block, A. Capucci, B. Luderitz, M. Santini, and P.E. Vardas
Indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Study Group on Guidelines on ICDs of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1074 - 1081.
[PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. N. W. Hauer, E. Aliot, M. Block, A. Capucci, B. Luderitz, M. Santini, and P. E. Vardas
Indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy: Study Group on Guidelines on ICD of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 169 - 176.
[PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
G. R. Haddow and M. Neville
Anesthetic Implications for Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2000; 4(3): 187 - 195.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Ömeroglu S. N., K. Kirali, M. Guler, M. Erdem Toker, and C. Yakut
Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 844 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B Brembilla-Perrot, P Houriez, O Claudon, J-P Preiss, and D Beurrier
Predicting the effect of D,L-sotalol on ventricular tachycardia inducibility from the RR variability response
Heart, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 307 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. J. Goldberger
Treatment and Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Effect of Recent Clinical Trials
Arch Intern Med, June 28, 1999; 159(12): 1281 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Kuhlkamp, C. Mewis, J. Mermi, R. F. Bosch, and L. Seipel
Suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of d,l-sotalol with no antiarrhythmic drug treatment
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R. Elbeery, P. M. Brown, and W. R. Chitwood Jr
Intraoperative MIDCABG arteriography via the left radial artery: a comparison with doppler ultrasound for assessment of graft patency
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1998; 66(1): 51 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. H. Selzman, T. A. Whitehill, B. D. Shames, E. J. Pulido, B. C. Cain, and A. H. Harken
The Biology of Estrogen-Mediated Repair of Cardiovascular Injury
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 65(3): 868 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R. Elbeery and W. R. Chitwood Jr
Intraoperative Catheterization of the Left Internal Mammary Artery via the Left Radial Artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1840 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
d,l-Sotalol vs. ICDs for Arrhythmia
Journal Watch Cardiology, September 1, 1996; 1996(901): 6 - 6.
[Full Text]