(Circulation. 1996;94:748-754.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.
Correspondence to Sanjiv Kaul, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Box 158, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
Background The aim of this study was to determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) during exogenous vasodilation can accurately delineate infarct size, and hence the extent of myocardial viability, both immediately (15 minutes) and late (3 hours) after reperfusion when postreflow coronary hyperemia is still present.
Methods and Results Twenty-one open-chest anesthetized dogs underwent 3 to 6 hours of coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion. MCE was performed 15 minutes after reflow before and during infusion of 0.2 mg·kg-1·min-1 adenosine IV. In 12 dogs, infarct size was measured at this time. In the remaining 9 dogs, reperfusion was continued for 3 hours, when MCE was repeated before and after an infusion of 0.56 mg·kg-1·min-1 dipyridamole IV and infarct size was measured. In the absence of adenosine, MCE perfusion defect at 15 minutes underestimated infarct sizes at both 15 minutes and 3 hours, whereas in the presence of adenosine, the estimate of infarct size was more accurate. Similarly, in the absence of dipyridamole, although MCE perfusion defect underestimated infarct size (both measured 3 hours after reflow), in the presence of dipyridamole, the estimate of infarct size was more accurate.
Conclusions By unmasking abnormalities in flow reserve within the infarct bed, MCE in conjunction with coronary vasodilators can accurately predict infarct size both 15 minutes and 3 hours after reperfusion. Thus, MCE can be used for assessing the extent of myocardial viability both immediately and late after reperfusion when postreflow coronary hyperemia is still present.
Key Words: myocardium echocardiography vasodilation infarction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Bierig, P. Mikolajczak, S. C. Herrmann, N. Elmore, M. Kern, and A. J. Labovitz Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography derived myocardial perfusion reserve with invasive determination of coronary flow reserve Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A 25-Year Retrospective Circulation, July 15, 2008; 118(3): 291 - 308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Montisci, L Chen, M Ruscazio, P Colonna, C Cadeddu, C Caiati, M Montisci, L Meloni, and S Iliceto Non-invasive coronary flow reserve is correlated with microvascular integrity and myocardial viability after primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1113 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sakuma, I. Sari, C. N. Goodman, J. R. Lindner, A. L. Klibanov, and S. Kaul Simultaneous integrin {alpha}v{beta}3 and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition causes reduction in infarct size in a model of acute coronary thrombosis and primary angioplasty Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2005; 66(3): 552 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffemann and R. A. Kloner Microvascular Alterations After Temporary Coronary Artery Occlusion: The No-Reflow Phenomenon Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sakuma, J. Sklenar, H. Leong-Poi, N. C. Goodman, D. K. Glover, and S. Kaul Molecular Imaging Identifies Regions with Microthromboemboli During Primary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Thrombosis J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1194 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lepper, T. Belcik, K. Wei, J. R. Lindner, J. Sklenar, and S. Kaul Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): 3132 - 3135. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul and H. Ito Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Ischemia: Part II: Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Circulation, January 27, 2004; 109(3): 310 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L A Pierard Assessing perfusion and function in acute myocardial infarction: how and when? Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 701 - 703. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, E. Mariano, F. Pizzuto, P. E. Puddu, and F. Romeo Coronary recanalization in anterior myocardial infarction: The open perforator hypothesis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2002; 40(7): 1205 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. t. Lafitte, A. Higashiyama, H. Masugata, B. Peters, M. Strachan, O. i L. Kwan, and A. N. DeMaria Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1546 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Andrassy, M Zielinska, R Busch, A Schomig, and C Firschke Myocardial blood volume and the amount of viable myocardium early after mechanical reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction: prospective study using venous contrast echocardiography Heart, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 350 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Coggins, J. Sklenar, D. E. Le, K. Wei, J. R. Lindner, and S. Kaul Noninvasive Prediction of Ultimate Infarct Size at the Time of Acute Coronary Occlusion Based on the Extent and Magnitude of Collateral-Derived Myocardial Blood Flow Circulation, November 13, 2001; 104(20): 2471 - 2477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hamada, T. Nishiue, S. Nakamura, T. Sugiura, H. Kamihata, H. Miyoshi, Y. Imuro, and T. Iwasaka TIMI frame count immediately after primary coronary angioplasty as a predictor of functional recovery in patients with TIMI 3 reperfused acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 666 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Teupe, M. Takeuchi, J. Yao, E. Avelar, and N. Pandian Detection of Viable Myocardium by Transvenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Using Harmonic Power Doppler : Canine Model of Acute Coronary Occlusion and Reperfusion Chest, August 1, 2001; 120(2): 567 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Eeckhout and M.J Kern The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2001; 22(9): 729 - 739. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Mills, D. Fischer, and F. S. Villanueva Coronary collateral development during chronic ischemia: serial assessment using harmonic myocardial contrast echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2000; 36(2): 618 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lepper, R. Hoffmann, O. Kamp, A. Franke, C. C. de Cock, H. P. Kuhl, G. T. Sieswerda, J. v. Dahl, U. Janssens, P. Voci, et al. Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, May 23, 2000; 101(20): 2368 - 2374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Teiger, J. Garot, E. Aptecar, P. Bosio, J. Woscoboinik, J.M. Pernes, P. Gueret, M. Kern, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Dupouy Coronary blood flow reserve and wall motion recovery in patients undergoing angioplasty for myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., February 2, 1999; 20(4): 285 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. KAUL Myocardial contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction: time to test for routine clinical use? Heart, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 2 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Brochet, D. Czitrom, D. Karila-Cohen, P. Seknadji, M. Faraggi, H. Benamer, P. Aubry, P. G. Steg, and P. Assayag Early changes in myocardial perfusion patterns after myocardial infarction: relation with contractile reserve and functional recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 2011 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sakuma, Y. Hayashi, K. Sumii, M. Imazu, and M. Yamakido Prediction of short- and intermediate-term prognoses of patients with acute myocardial infarction using myocardial contrast echocardiography one day after recanalization J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1998; 32(4): 890 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul Assessing the Myocardium After Attempted Reperfusion : Should We Bother? Circulation, August 18, 1998; 98(7): 625 - 627. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography : 15 Years of Research and Development Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3745 - 3760. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Christiansen, H. Leong-Poi, A. L. Klibanov, S. Kaul, and J. R. Lindner Noninvasive Imaging of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury Using Leukocyte-Targeted Contrast Echocardiography Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1764 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |