(Circulation. 1997;96:1139-1144.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle-Branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction
A Study in the Thrombolytic Era
From the Hospital Virgen del Rosell de Cartagena (A.M.-M., J.G.-S., J.A.-G.), Cartagena, the Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia (J.G.-T.), Murcia, and the Hospital General Universitario de Murcia (A.G.-A., M.V.-C., F.J.C.-S., E.M.-S.), Murcia, Spain.
Correspondence to José Galcerá-Tomás, Unidad Coronaria, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Carretera de Cartagena s/n, El Palmar, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Background Whereas the significance of right bundle-branch block (RBBB) in acute myocardial infarction was extensively studied in the prethrombolytic era, a possible change in the overall incidence and meaning of RBBB as a consequence of thrombolytic therapy is not well known.
Methods and Results A multicenter, prospective study of 1238 patients consecutively diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction and admitted to three coronary care units was conducted. ECGs during the acute phase and clinical events until discharge and 1-year follow-up were monitored. In the 135 (10.9%) patients in whom RBBB was found, there were 51 (37.8%) new cases, 46 (34.1%) old cases, and 38 (28.1%) cases with an indeterminate time of origin. New RBBB was permanent in 26 and transient in 25 patients. RBBB was isolated in 76 (56%) and bifascicular in the remaining 59 (44%) patients. The following complications were more frequently associated with RBBB than non-RBBB patients: heart failure, 24% versus 46% (P<.001); use of pacemaker because of atrioventricular block, 3.6% versus 11% (P<.001); and 1-year mortality, 17.6% versus 40.7% (P<.001). Early mortality was significantly higher for new RBBB (43.1%, P<.001) than for old (15.5%) and indeterminate (15.3%) RBBB. These figures for 1-year mortality were 58.8% (P<.001), 35.5 (P<.01), and 23% (NS), respectively. Permanent and transient RBBB had different mortality rates: early mortality, 76% versus 8%, and 1-year mortality, 84% versus 32% (P<.001 for both). For isolated RBBB versus bifascicular block, early mortality was 14.4% versus 40.6%, and 1-year mortality was 30.2% versus 54.2% (P<.05 for both). Multivariate analysis showed an independent prognostic value of RBBB for early and 1-year mortality.
Conclusions The overall meaning of RBBB in acute myocardial infarction has not changed in the thrombolytic era, although a higher rate of new and transient RBBB and a lower rate of bifascicular block may represent a beneficial effect of thrombolytic therapy.
Key Words: bundle-branch block • myocardial infarction • prognosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C.-K. Wong, W. Gao, R. A.H. Stewart, N. van Pelt, J. K. French, P. E.G. Aylward, H. D. White, and on behalf of the Hirulog Early Reperfusion Occlusi Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction and Right Bundle-Branch Block: Importance of QRS Duration and Early ST-Segment Resolution After Fibrinolytic Therapy Circulation, August 22, 2006; 114(8): 783 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Suzuki, T. Sakaue, M. Tanaka, E. Hirose, H. Saeki, T. Matsunaka, S. Hiramatsu, and Y. Kazatani Association Between Right Bundle Branch Block and Impaired Myocardial Tissue-Level Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 2122 - 2124. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Bauer, M. A. Watanabe, P. Barthel, R. Schneider, K. Ulm, and G. Schmidt QRS duration and late mortality in unselected post-infarction patients of the revascularization era Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2006; 27(4): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Di Chiara Right bundle branch block during the acute phase of myocardial infarction: modern redefinitions of old concepts Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-K. Wong, R. A.H. Stewart, W. Gao, J. K. French, C. Raffel, H. D. White, and for the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Tomoda and N. Aoki Right Bundle Branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting Angiology, March 1, 2005; 56(2): 131 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Madias, D. Bravidis, and M. Attari Posterior Myocardial Infarction and Complete Right Bundle- Branch Block Chest, November 1, 2002; 122(5): 1860 - 1864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Galcera-Tomas, F. J. Castillo-Soria, M. Villegas-Garcia, R. Florenciano-Sanchez, J. G. Sanchez-Villanueva, J. A. N. de la Rosa, A. Martinez-Caballero, J. A. Valenti-Aldeguer, P. Jara-Perez, M. Parraga-Ramirez, et al. Effects of Early Use of Atenolol or Captopril on Infarct Size and Ventricular Volume : A Double-Blind Comparison in Patients With Anterior Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, February 13, 2001; 103(6): 813 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Brembilla-Perrot, C. Suty-Selton, P. Houriez, O. Claudon, D. Beurrier, and A. T. de la Chaise Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Bueno, R. Lopez-Palop, E. Perez-David, J. Garcia-Garcia, J. L. Lopez-Sendon, and J. L. Delcan Combined Effect of Age and Right Ventricular Involvement on Acute Inferior Myocardial Infarction Prognosis Circulation, October 27, 1998; 98(17): 1714 - 1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|