Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;97:1738-1745

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.

(Circulation. 1998;97:1738-1745.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science reports

Myocardial Discontinuities

A Substrate for Producing Virtual Electrodes That Directly Excite the Myocardium by Shocks

James B. White, BS; Gregory P. Walcott, MD; Andrew E. Pollard, PhD; ; Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Departments of Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, and Physiology and Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Correspondence to Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD, Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, B140 Volker Hall, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail rei{at}crml.uab.edu

Abstract

Background—Theoretical models suggest that an electrical stimulus causes regions of depolarization and hyperpolarization on either side of a myocardial discontinuity. This study determined experimentally whether an artificial discontinuity gives rise to an activation front in response to an electrical stimulus, consistent with the creation of such polarized regions.

Methods and Results—After a thoracotomy in six dogs, a 504-unipolar-electrode plaque was sutured to the right ventricular epicardium to map activations. From a line electrode parallel to one side of the plaque, 10 S1 stimuli were delivered, followed by S2 and S3 stimuli (S1S1, S1S2, S2S3 interval=300 ms). S1 and S3 stimuli were 25 mA; 5-ms S2 stimuli of both polarities were initially 25 mA and increased in 25 mA increments. The plaque was removed, and a transmural incision was made through the ventricular wall in the middle of the mapped region and sutured closed. The plaque was replaced and the stimulation protocol repeated. Before the incision, S2 stimuli directly activated tissue only near the stimulation site. An activation front arose at the border of the directly activated region and propagated across the plaque. As the S2 stimulus strength was increased, the size of the directly activated region increased. After the incision, sufficiently large S2 stimuli caused direct activation of tissue adjacent to the transmural incision as well as at the stimulation site. Activation fronts that arose adjacent to the transmural incision either propagated proximally toward the stimulation site and collided with the activation front originating from the stimulation wire or propagated distally away from the incision. Minimum S2 stimulus strengths activating areas adjacent to the incision were only 45±14% (cathode) and 39±18% (anode) of the strengths required to directly activate the same area before the incision was formed (P<.05).

Conclusions—Myocardial discontinuities can give rise to activation fronts after a stimulus, suggesting the presence of polarized regions adjacent to the discontinuity.


Key Words: defibrillation • excitation • mapping • electrical stimulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
M. L. Trew, B. J. Caldwell, G. B. Sands, D. A. Hooks, D. C.-S. Tai, T. M. Austin, I. J. LeGrice, A. J. Pullan, and B. H. Smaill
Cardiac electrophysiology and tissue structure: bridging the scale gap with a joint measurement and modelling paradigm
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 355 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N. H. L. Kuijpers, R. H. Keldermann, T. Arts, and P. A. J. Hilbers
Computer simulations of successful defibrillation in decoupled and non-uniform cardiac tissue
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S166 - S177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. A. Mowrey, Y. Cheng, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 27 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Al-Khadra, V. Nikolski, and I. R. Efimov
The Role of Electroporation in Defibrillation
Circ. Res., October 27, 2000; 87(9): 797 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Cheng, K. A. Mowrey, D. R. Van Wagoner, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Virtual Electrode-Induced Reexcitation : A Mechanism of Defibrillation
Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1056 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]