Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;97:2567-2574

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirchhof, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Franz, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirchhof, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Franz, M. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arrhythmia
Hazardous Substances DB
*PROCAINAMIDE

(Circulation. 1998;97:2567-2574.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Postrepolarization Refractoriness Versus Conduction Slowing Caused by Class I Antiarrhythmic Drugs

Antiarrhythmic and Proarrhythmic Effects

Paulus F. Kirchhof, MD; C. Larissa Fabritz, MD; ; Michael R. Franz, MD, PhD

From the Cardiology Divisions, Veterans National Administration and Georgetown University Medical Centers, Washington, DC (P.F.K., C.L.F., M.R.F.) and the University of Münster, Germany (P.F.K., C.L.F.).

Correspondence to Michael R. Franz, MD, PhD, Veterans Administration Medical Center, 50 Irving St, NW, Washington, DC 20422.

Background—Conduction block may be both antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic. Drug-induced postrepolarization refractoriness (PRR) may prevent premature excitation and tachyarrhythmia induction. The effects of propafenone and procainamide on these parameters, and their antiarrhythmic or proarrhythmic consequences, were investigated.

Methods and Results—In 11 isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, monophasic action potentials (MAPs) were recorded simultaneously from six to seven different right and left ventricular sites, along with a volume-conducted ECG. All recordings were used to discern ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) induced by repetitive extrastimulation (S2-S5) or 10-second burst stimulation at 25 to 200 Hz at baseline and after addition of procainamide (20 µmol/L) or propafenone (1 µmol/L) to the perfusate. MAPs were analyzed for action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90), conduction times (CT) between the pacing site and the other MAPs, and PRR (effective refractory period-APD90=PRR) and related to the induction of VT or VF. During steady-state pacing, procainamide and propafenone prolonged APD90 by 12% and 14%, respectively. Procainamide slowed mean CT by 40% during S2-S5 pacing, whereas propafenone slowed mean CT by up to 400% (P<0.001 versus baseline and procainamide). Wavelength was not changed significantly by procainamide but was shortened fourfold by propafenone at S5. Both drugs produced PRR, which was associated with a 70% decrease in VF inducibility with procainamide and elimination of VF with propafenone. Despite this protection from VF, monomorphic VT was induced with propafenone in 57% of burst stimulations.

Conclusions—Drug-induced PRR protects against VF induction. Propafenone promotes slow monomorphic VT, probably by use-dependent conduction slowing and wavelength shortening.


Key Words: fibrillation • conduction • propafenone • procainamide




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. Kirchhof, H. Degen, M. R. Franz, L. Eckardt, L. Fabritz, P. Milberg, S. Laer, J. Neumann, G. Breithardt, and W. Haverkamp
Amiodarone-Induced Postrepolarization Refractoriness Suppresses Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2003; 305(1): 257 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. Fabritz, P. Kirchhof, M. R Franz, D. Nuyens, T. Rossenbacker, A. Ottenhof, W. Haverkamp, G. Breithardt, E. Carmeliet, and P. Carmeliet
Effect of pacing and mexiletine on dispersion of repolarisation and arrhythmias in {Delta}KPQ SCN5A (long QT3) mice
Cardiovasc Res, March 15, 2003; 57(4): 1085 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Huang, J. L. Skinner, J. M. Rogers, W. M. Smith, W. L. Holman, and R. E. Ideker
The effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns and defibrillation threshold during ventricular fibrillation in dogs
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2002; 40(2): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. N Plotnikov, A. Shvilkin, W. Xiong, J. R de Groot, L. Rosenshtraukh, S. Feinmark, R. Gainullin, P. Danilo Jr., and M. R Rosen
Interactions between antiarrhythmic drugs and cardiac memory
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 335 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
M. Valderrabano and B. N. Singh
Review : Electrophysiologic and Antiarrhythmic Effects of Propafenone: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(3): 183 - 198.
[PDF]