Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;98:1517-1524

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, P. G.

(Circulation. 1998;98:1517-1524.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Gross and Microscopic Pathological Changes Associated With Nonthoracotomy Implantable Defibrillator Leads

Andrew E. Epstein, MD; G. Neal Kay, MD; Vance J. Plumb, MD; Sharon M. Dailey, MD; ; Peter G. Anderson, DVM, PhD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine (A.E.E., G.N.K., V.J.P., S.M.D.), and the Department of Pathology (P.G.A.), University of Alabama, Birmingham.

Correspondence to Andrew E. Epstein, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University Station, THT 321L, Birmingham, AL 35294-0006. E-mail aepstein{at}uab.edu

Background—Although the effects of epicardial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads on underlying cardiac tissue have been reported, the gross and microscopic changes associated with endocardial ICD leads are less well described. This study describes the gross and microscopic changes associated with endocardial ICD leads in humans.

Methods and Results—The hearts from 8 patients were examined. At the time of ICD implantation, the patients' mean age was 47±11 years, and the left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.24±0.10. Four patients had ischemic heart disease, and 4 had dilated cardiomyopathy. Five hearts were examined after transplantation; 3, after death. The electrode-myocardial interfaces were characterized by intense endocardial fibrosis and were remarkably consistent. Each lead was encased by a ring of fibroelastic tissue, and there was fibrosis of the right ventricular myocardium adjacent to the leads. Fibrosis involved the tricuspid valve in 5 patients, and 1 had perforation of the valve by the lead. Microscopically, interstitial fibrosis was adjacent to each lead in the current path of ICD shocks. Acute cell injury was present only in the hearts that had received recent shocks.

Conclusions—The ICD electrode-myocardial interface is characterized by intense fibrosis. The fibrosis associated with endocardial ICD leads and the cumulative acute damage produced by defibrillation discharges may explain changes in the defibrillation and pacing thresholds and the difficulty of lead extraction that can be encountered with transvenous ICD systems.


Key Words: arrhythmia • death, sudden • defibrillation • fibrillation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Franceschi, F. Thuny, R. Giorgi, I. Sanaa, E. Peyrouse, X. Assouan, S. Prevot, E. Bastard, G. Habib, and J.-C. Deharo
Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of traumatic tricuspid regurgitation after percutaneous ventricular lead removal.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 9, 2009; 53(23): 2168 - 2174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Goette, F. Cantu, L. van Erven, P. Geelen, F. Halimi, J. L. Merino, J. M. Morgan, and on behalf of the Scientific Initiative Committee o
Performance and survival of transvenous defibrillation leads: need for a European data registry
Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 31 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. P. Daubert, W. Zareba, D. S. Cannom, S. McNitt, S. Z. Rosero, P. Wang, C. Schuger, J. S. Steinberg, S. L. Higgins, D. J. Wilber, et al.
Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT II: Frequency, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Survival Impact
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 8, 2008; 51(14): 1357 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Camboni, C. G. Wollmann, A. Loher, R. Gradaus, H. H. Scheld, and C. Schmid
Explantation of Implantable Defibrillator Leads Using Open Heart Surgery or Percutaneous Techniques
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 50 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. A. Gatzoulis, G. K. Andrikopoulos, T. Apostolopoulos, E. Sotiropoulos, G. Zervopoulos, J. Antoniou, S. Brili, and C. I. Stefanadis
Electrical storm is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome in the era of implantable defibrillator therapy
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(2): 184 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. A. L. E. Bracke, A. Meijer, and L. M. van Gelder
Malfunction of endocardial defibrillator leads and lead extraction: where do they meet?
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 19 - 24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. V. Exner, G. J. Klein, and E. N. Prystowsky
Primary Prevention of Sudden Death With Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Cardiac Disease: Can We Afford to Do It? (Can We Afford Not To?)
Circulation, September 25, 2001; 104(13): 1564 - 1570.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. E. Ideker, A. E. Epstein, and G. P. Walcott
Is there an optimal capacitance for defibrillation?
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(4): 275 - 277.
[PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D J Heaven, M Y Henein, and R Sutton
Pacemaker lead related tricuspid stenosis: a report of two cases
Heart, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 351 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text]