(Circulation. 1998;98:2160-2167.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Influence of Lead Selection and Population on Automated Measurement of QT Dispersion
From the University of Glasgow (P.W.M., S.C.M.), Glasgow, Scotland, and Monklands Hospital (J.C.R.), Airdrie, Scotland.
Correspondence to Professor P.W. Macfarlane, University Department of Medical Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, Scotland. E-mail peter.w.macfarlane{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Background—The study of QT dispersion (QTd) is of increasing clinical interest, but there are very few data in large healthy populations. Furthermore, there is still discussion on the extent to which QTd reflects dispersion of measurement. This study addresses these problems.
Methods and Results—Twelve-lead ECGs recorded on 1501 apparently healthy adults and 1784 healthy neonates, infants, and children were used to derive normal limits of QTd and QT intervals by use of a fully automated approach. No age gradient or sex differences in QTd were seen and it was found that an upper limit of 50 ms was highly specific. Three-orthogonal-lead ECGs (n=1220) from the Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography database were used to generate derived 12-lead ECGs, which had a significant increase in QTd of 10.1±13.1 ms compared with the original orthogonal-lead ECG but a mean difference of only 1.63±12.2 ms compared with the original 12-lead ECGs. In a population of 361 patients with old myocardial infarction, there was a statistically significant increase in mean QTd compared with that of the adult normal group (32.7±10.0 versus 24.53±8.2 ms; P<0.0001). An estimate of computer measurement error was also obtained by creating 2 sets of 1220 ECGs from the original set of 1220. The mean error (difference in QTd on a paired basis) was found to be 0.28±9.7 ms.
Conclusions—These data indicate that QTd is age and sex independent, has a highly specific upper normal limit of 50 ms, is significantly lower in the 3-orthogonal-lead than in the 12-lead ECG, and is longer in patients with a previous myocardial infarction than in normal subjects.
Key Words: intervals • computers • reference values • electrocardiography • myocardial infarction
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  E. Pueyo, J. P. Martinez, and P. Laguna Cardiac repolarization analysis using the surface electrocardiogram Phil Trans R Soc A, January 28, 2009; 367(1887): 213 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-M. Su, H.-C. Chiu, T.-H. Lin, W.-C. Voon, H.-W. Liu, and W.-T. Lai Longitudinal study of the ageing trends in QT interval and dispersion in healthy elderly subjects. Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 636 - 638. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C R. Cardoso, M A. Sales, J A. Papi, and G F Salles QT-interval parameters are increased in systemic lupus erythematosus patients Lupus, October 1, 2005; 14(10): 846 - 852. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Kumar, M. Fisher, and P. W Macfarlane Review: Diabetes and the QT interval: time for debate The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, May 1, 2004; 4(3): 146 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Okin QT interval prolongation and prognosis: further validation of the quantitative approach to electrocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 572 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X Jouven, A Hagege, P Charron, L Carrier, O Dubourg, J M Langlard, S Aliaga, J B Bouhour, K Schwartz, M Desnos, et al. Relation between QT duration and maximal wall thickness in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 153 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ikeda, H. Sakurada, K. Sakabe, T. Sakata, M. Takami, N. Tezuka, T. Nakae, M. Noro, Y. Enjoji, T. Tejima, et al. Assessment of noninvasive markers in identifying patients at risk in the brugada syndrome: insight into risk stratification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1628 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Malik and V. N. Batchvarov Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1749 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. O'Brien, M. Apkon, C. I. Berul, H. T. Patel, K. Saupe, M. Spindler, J. S. Ingwall, and R. Zahler Phenotypical features of long Q-T syndrome in transgenic mice expressing human Na-K-ATPase alpha 3-isoform in hearts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2133 - H2142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Kakuta, Y. Maruyama, Y. Hashimoto, N. Yoshimoto, F. Numano, and T. Kato QT Dispersion in Patients with Takayasu Arteritis Angiology, September 1, 2000; 51(9): 751 - 756. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Sahu, P.O. Lim, B.S. Rana, and A.D. Struthers QT dispersion in medicine: electrophysiological Holy Grail or fool's gold? QJM, July 1, 2000; 93(7): 425 - 431. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, B. V. Howard, R. R. Fabsitz, E. T. Lee, and T. K. Welty Assessment of QT Interval and QT Dispersion for Prediction of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in American Indians : The Strong Heart Study Circulation, January 4, 2000; 101(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|