This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kürkciyan, I. Articles by Laggner, A. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kürkciyan, I. Articles by Laggner, A. N.

(Circulation. 1998;98:766-771.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Accuracy and Impact of Presumed Cause in Patients With Cardiac Arrest

Istepan Kürkciyan, MD; Giora Meron, MD; Wilhelm Behringer, MD; Fritz Sterz, MD; Andrea Berzlanovich, MD; Hans Domanovits, MD; Marcus Müllner, MD; Hans C. Bankl, MD; ; Anton N. Laggner, MD

From the Department of Emergency Medicine (I.K., G.M., W.B., F.S., M.M., A.N.L.), Institute of Forensic Medicine (A.B.), and Institute of Clinical Pathology (H.C.B.), General Hospital of Vienna, University of Vienna, Austria.

Correspondence to Univ Prof Dr med Fritz Sterz, Abteilung für Notfallmedizin, Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien, Universitätskliniken, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, 1090 Wien, Austria. E-mail fritz.sterz{at}akh-wien.ac.at

Background—International guidelines recommend differentiation between cardiac and noncardiac causes of cardiac arrest. The aim of this study was to find the rate of agreement between primarily postulated and definitive causes of cardiac arrest.

Methods and Results—We retrospectively analyzed the primarily presumed cause of cardiac arrest as determined by the emergency room physician on admission in all patients admitted to the emergency department of one urban tertiary care hospital. This was compared with the definitive cause as established by clinical evidence or autopsy. Within 4 years, the initially presumed cause was unclear in 24 (4%) of 593 patients. In the remaining 569 patients, the presumed cause was correct in 509 (89%) and wrong in 60 (11%) cases. Cardiac origin was presumed in 421 (71%) and the definitive cause in 408 (69%) cases. Noncardiac origin was presumed in 148 (25%) and the definitive cause in 185 (31%) patients. Presumed cardiac cause was sensitive (96%) but less specific (77%). Noncardiac causes such as pulmonary embolism, cerebral disorders, or exsanguination were those most frequently overlooked. Asystole occurred significantly more often in patients in whom presumed cause remained undetermined or differed from the definitive cause.

Conclusions—Cause of cardiac arrest is not as easily recognized as anticipated, especially when the initial rhythm is different from ventricular fibrillation. This might affect comparability of study results, therapeutic strategies, prognosis, and outcome. Patients in whom the presumed cause was confirmed as being correct had significantly better survival and neurological outcome.

Key Words: resuscitation • epidemiology • heart arrest • pathology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Babuty and M. J Lab Mechanoelectric contributions to sudden cardiac death Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 270 - 279. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L H Soo, D Gray, T Young, and J R Hampton Circadian variation in witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest Heart, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 370 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Santini Sex differences in outcome following community-based cardiopulmonary arrest Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2000; 21(3): 173 - 175. [PDF]

				J.P Pell, J Sirel, A.K Marsden, and S.M Cobbe Sex differences in outcome following community-based cardiopulmonary arrest Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2000; 21(3): 239 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Teerlink, M. Jalaluddin, S. Anderson, M. L. Kukin, E. J. Eichhorn, G. Francis, M. Packer, and B. M. Massie Ambulatory Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Heart Failure Do Not Specifically Predict an Increased Risk of Sudden Death Circulation, January 4, 2000; 101(1): 40 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]