From the Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging Laboratory (R.H.M., J.B., S.L.,
J.A., R.M.L.), University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill;
Cardiovascular Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (R.S.H., A.P.Y.), Georgia Institute
of Technology, Atlanta, Ga; Departments of Pathology (R.B.) and Cardiovascular
Surgery (W.P.), Rush-PresbyterianSt. Lukes' Medical Center,
Chicago, Ill; and Echocardiography Laboratory (B.V., R.E.K.), University of
Iowa Hospital, Iowa City.
Correspondence to Richard H. Marcus, Cardiovascular Ultrasound Laboratories, Iowa Heart Center, 411 Laurel St, Suite 1250, Des Moines, IA 50314-3046.
BackgroundNoninvasive assessment of
functionally stenotic small-diameter aortic mechanical
prostheses is complicated by theoretical constraints relating to the
hemodynamic relevance of Doppler-derived
transprosthetic gradients. To establish the utility of
Doppler echocardiography for evaluation of
these valves, 20-mm Medtronic Hall and 19-mm St Jude prostheses were
studied in vitro and in vivo.
Methods and ResultsRelations between the orifice
transprosthetic gradient (equivalent to Doppler), the
downstream gradient in the zone of recovered pressure (equivalent to
catheter), and fluid mechanical energy losses were examined in vitro.
Pressure-flow relations across the 2 prostheses were evaluated by
Doppler echocardiography in vivo. For both
types of prosthesis in vitro, the orifice was higher than the
downstream gradient (P<0.001), and fluid mechanical
energy losses were as strongly correlated with orifice as with
downstream pressure gradients (r2=0.99 for
both). Orifice and downstream gradients were higher and fluid
mechanical energy losses were larger for the St Jude than the Medtronic
Hall valve (all P<0.001). Whereas estimated effective
orifice areas for the 2 valves in vivo were not significantly
different, model-independent dynamic analysis of pressure-flow
relations revealed higher gradients for the St Jude than the Medtronic
Hall valve at a given flow rate (P<0.05).
ConclusionsEven in the presence of significant pressure
recovery, the Doppler-derived gradient across small-diameter aortic
mechanical prostheses does have hemodynamic relevance
insofar as it reflects myocardial energy expenditure. Small differences
in function between stenotic aortic mechanical prostheses,
undetectable by conventional orifice area estimations, can be
identified by dynamic Doppler echocardiographic
analysis of pressure-flow relations.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Assessment of Small-Diameter Aortic Mechanical Prostheses
Physiological Relevance of the Doppler Gradient, Utility of Flow Augmentation, and Limitations of Orifice Area Estimation
Key Words: prosthesis echocardiography hemodynamics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R J Edwards, M Al-Bustami, and C D J Ilsley A novel method of assessing Starr-Edwards aortic valve stenosis Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1479 - 1480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. De Carlo, A. D. Milano, C. Nardi, G. Mecozzi, and U. Bortolotti Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized sorin bicarbon prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Siniawski, H. Lehmkuhl, Y. Weng, M. Pasic, C. Yankah, M. Hoffmann, I. Behnke, and R. Hetzer Stentless aortic valves as an alternative to homografts for valve replacement in active infective endocarditis complicated by ring abscess Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. McCullough, E. F. Philbin, J. A. Spertus, S. Kaatz, K. R. Sandberg, and W. D. Weaver Confirmation of a heart failure epidemic: findings from the Resource Utilization Among Congestive Heart Failure (REACH) study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 60 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Butchart, H.-H. Li, N. Payne, K. Buchan, and G. L. Grunkemeier Twenty years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2001; 121(6): 1090 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |