Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 16, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print June 16, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.747642
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/1/49    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.747642v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thiele, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuler, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thiele, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuler, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Platelet function inhibitors
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on October 22, 2007
Accepted on May 2, 2008

Intracoronary Compared With Intravenous Bolus Abciximab Application in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The Randomized Leipzig Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Abciximab IV Versus IC in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial

Holger Thiele MD*, Kathrin Schindler MD, Josef Friedenberger MD, Ingo Eitel MD, Georg Fürnau MD, Eigk Grebe MD, Sandra Erbs MD, Axel Linke MD, Sven Möbius-Winkler MD, Dietmar Kivelitz MD, and Gerhard Schuler MD

From the University of Leipzig, Heart Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology (H.T., J.F., I.E., G.F., E.G., S.E., A.L., S.M.-W., G.S.), and Department of Radiology (K.S., D.K.), Leipzig, and Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin (D.K.), Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thielh{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Background—Abciximab reduces major adverse cardiac events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intracoronary abciximab bolus application results in high local drug concentrations and may be more effective than a standard intravenous bolus.

Methods and Results—Patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to either intracoronary (n=77) or intravenous (n=77) bolus abciximab administration with subsequent 12-hour intravenous infusion. The primary end point was infarct size and extent of microvascular obstruction as assessed by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance. Secondary end points were ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow and perfusion grades after PCI, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events within 30 days. The median infarct size was 15.1% (interquartile range, 6.1% to 25.2%) in the intracoronary versus 23.4% (interquartile range, 13.6% to 33.2%) in the intravenous group (P=0.01). Similarly, the extent of microvascular obstruction was significantly smaller in intracoronary compared with intravenous abciximab patients (P=0.01). Myocardial perfusion measured as early ST-segment resolution was significantly improved in intracoronary patients with an absolute ST-segment resolution of 77.8% (interquartile range, 66.7% to 100.0%) versus 70.0% (interquartile range, 45.2% to 83.5%; P=0.006). The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow after PCI was not different between treatment groups (P=0.51), but there was a trend toward an improved perfusion grade (P=0.09). There also was a trend toward a lower major adverse cardiac event rate after intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab application (5.2% versus 15.6%; P=0.06; relative risk, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.05).

Conclusions—Intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab in primary PCI is superior to standard intravenous treatment with respect to infarct size, extent of microvascular obstruction, and perfusion.


Key words: angioplasty • infarction • magnetic resonance imaging • platelets • reperfusion


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Niccoli, F. Burzotta, L. Galiuto, and F. Crea
Myocardial no-reflow in humans.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 281 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Witkowski, P. Maciejewski, W. Wasek, L. A. Malek, M. Niewada, B. Kaminski, J. Drzewiecki, M. Kosmider, J. Kubica, W. Ruzyllo, et al.
Influence of different antiplatelet treatment regimens for primary percutaneous coronary intervention on all-cause mortality
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2009; 30(14): 1736 - 1743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Abdellaoui, G. Rioufol, and G. Finet
Letter by Abdellaoui et al Regarding Article, "Intracoronary Compared With Intravenous Bolus Abciximab Application in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention"
Circulation, January 27, 2009; 119(3): e19 - e19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Thiele, J. Friedenberger, I. Eitel, G. Furnau, E. Grebe, S. Erbs, A. Linke, S. Mobius-Winkler, G. Schuler, K. Schindler, et al.
Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Intracoronary Compared With Intravenous Bolus Abciximab Application in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention"
Circulation, January 27, 2009; 119(3): e20 - e20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
G. De Luca
Adjunctive antithrombotic therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2008; 10(suppl_J): J2 - J14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. S. Coller and S. J. Shattil
The GPIIb/IIIa (integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3) odyssey: a technology-driven saga of a receptor with twists, turns, and even a bend
Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3011 - 3025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab Delivery
Journal Watch Cardiology, July 30, 2008; 2008(730): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Gibson, C. Zorkun, and V. Kunadian
Intracoronary Administration of Abciximab in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, July 1, 2008; 118(1): 6 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]