Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 30, 2009

Circulation. 2009
Published online before print March 30, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.796888
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 14, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/14/1925    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.796888v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Libby, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Libby, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Transplantation
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy
Right arrow Other Research
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on June 4, 2008
Accepted on January 30, 2009

Molecular Imaging of Innate Immune Cell Function in Transplant Rejection

Thomas Christen MD, PhD, Matthias Nahrendorf MD, PhD, Moritz Wildgruber MD, Filip K. Swirski PhD, Elena Aikawa MD, PhD, Peter Waterman BS, Koichi Shimizu MD, PhD, Ralph Weissleder MD, PhD, and Peter Libby MD*

From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (T.C., K.S., P.L.); Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (M.N., F.S., P.W., R.W.); Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston (R.W.); and Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (M.N., E.A., M.W., F.K.S., P.W., Y.I., R.W.), Mass.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: plibby{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu.

Background—Clinical detection of transplant rejection by repeated endomyocardial biopsy requires catheterization and entails risks. Recently developed molecular and cellular imaging techniques that visualize macrophage host responses could provide a noninvasive alternative. Yet, which macrophage functions may provide useful markers for detecting parenchymal rejection remains uncertain.

Methods and Results—We transplanted isografts from B6 mice and allografts from Balb/c mice heterotopically into B6 recipients. In this allograft across major histocompatability barriers, the transplanted heart undergoes predictable progressive rejection, leading to graft failure after 1 week. During rejection, crucial macrophage functions, including phagocytosis and release of proteases, render these abundant innate immune cells attractive imaging targets. Two or 6 days after transplantation, we injected either a fluorescent protease sensor or a magnetofluorescent phagocytosis marker. Histological and flow cytometric analyses established that macrophages function as the major cellular signal source. In vivo, we obtained a 3-dimensional functional map of macrophages showing higher phagocytic uptake of magnetofluorescent nanoparticles during rejection using magnetic resonance imaging and higher protease activity in allografts than in isografts using tomographic fluorescence. We further assessed the sensitivity of imaging to detect the degree of rejection. In vivo imaging of macrophage response correlated closely with gradually increasing allograft rejection and attenuated rejection in recipients with a genetically impaired immune response resulting from a deficiency in recombinase-1 (RAG-1-/-).

Conclusions—Molecular imaging reporters of either phagocytosis or protease activity can detect cardiac allograft rejection noninvasively, promise to enhance the search for novel tolerance-inducing strategies, and have translational potential.


Key words: imaging • inflammation • leukocytes • rejection • transplantation


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 1843-1845. [Extract] [Full Text]