Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 16, 2009

Circulation. 2009
Published online before print March 16, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.801753
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 31, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Circulation: March 31, 2009, Volume 119, Number 12
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/12/1616    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.801753v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Massie, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Massie, B. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID
*WARFARIN
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Coumarins
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on June 24, 2008
Accepted on January 12, 2009

Randomized Trial of Warfarin, Aspirin, and Clopidogrel in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. The Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) Trial

Barry M. Massie MD, Joseph F. Collins ScD*, Susan E. Ammon MS, RN, FNP, Paul W. Armstrong MD, John G.F. Cleland MD, Michael Ezekowitz MD, Syed M. Jafri MD, William F. Krol PhD, Christopher M. O'Connor MD, Kevin A. Schulman MD, Koon Teo MD, Stuart R. Warren Pharm D, for the WATCH Trial Investigators

From the Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, Calif (B.M.M., S.E.A.); Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Perry Point, Md (J.F.C., W.F.K.); University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (P.W.A.); Castle Hill Hospital, East Yorkshire, UK (J.G.F.C.); Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pa (M.E.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (S.M.J.); Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.M.O., K.A.S.); McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (K.T.); and Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM (S.R.W.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: joseph.collins2{at}va.gov.

Background—Chronic heart failure remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity. The role of antithrombotic therapy in patients with chronic heart failure has long been debated. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal antithrombotic agent for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fractions who are in sinus rhythm.

Methods and Results—This prospective, randomized clinical trial of open-label warfarin (target international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3.0) and double-blind treatment with either aspirin (162 mg once daily) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) had a 30-month enrollment period and a minimum of 12 months of treatment. We enrolled 1587 men and women ≥18 years of age with symptomatic heart failure for at least 3 months who were in sinus rhythm and had left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%. The primary outcome was the time to first occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. For the primary composite end point, the hazard ratios were as follows: for warfarin versus aspirin, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.12; P=0.77); for clopidogrel versus aspirin, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.40; P=0.57); and for warfarin versus clopidogrel, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.16; P=0.39). Warfarin was associated with fewer nonfatal strokes than aspirin or clopidogrel. Hospitalization for worsening heart failure occurred in 116 (22.2%), 97 (18.5%), and 89 (16.5%) patients treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin, respectively (P=0.02 for warfarin versus aspirin).

Conclusion—The primary outcome measure and the mortality data do not support the primary hypotheses that warfarin is superior to aspirin and that clopidogrel is superior to aspirin.


Key words: anticoagulants • aspirin • clopidogrel • heart failure • warfarin


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 1553-1555. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. D. Ezekowitz, M. J. Koti, and B. Fulton
Reducing Stroke Rates in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: How Low Can We Go?
Circulation, September 29, 2009; 120(13): 1169 - 1170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Konstam
Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Failure: WATCHful Wondering
Circulation, March 31, 2009; 119(12): 1559 - 1561.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
O. M. Hess, W. McKenna, and H.-P. Schultheiss
CHAPTER 18 Myocardial Disease
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]