| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on June 24, 2008
From the Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, Calif (B.M.M., S.E.A.); Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Perry Point, Md (J.F.C., W.F.K.); University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (P.W.A.); Castle Hill Hospital, East Yorkshire, UK (J.G.F.C.); Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pa (M.E.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (S.M.J.); Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.M.O., K.A.S.); McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (K.T.); and Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM (S.R.W.). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: joseph.collins2{at}va.gov.
Background—Chronic heart failure remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity. The role of antithrombotic therapy in patients with chronic heart failure has long been debated. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal antithrombotic agent for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fractions who are in sinus rhythm. Methods and Results—This prospective, randomized clinical trial of open-label warfarin (target international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3.0) and double-blind treatment with either aspirin (162 mg once daily) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) had a 30-month enrollment period and a minimum of 12 months of treatment. We enrolled 1587 men and women Conclusion—The primary outcome measure and the mortality data do not support the primary hypotheses that warfarin is superior to aspirin and that clopidogrel is superior to aspirin.
Accepted on January 12, 2009
Randomized Trial of Warfarin, Aspirin, and Clopidogrel in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. The Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) Trial
Barry M. Massie MD,
18 years of age with symptomatic heart failure for at least 3 months who were in sinus rhythm and had left ventricular ejection fraction of
35%. The primary outcome was the time to first occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. For the primary composite end point, the hazard ratios were as follows: for warfarin versus aspirin, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.12; P=0.77); for clopidogrel versus aspirin, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.40; P=0.57); and for warfarin versus clopidogrel, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.16; P=0.39). Warfarin was associated with fewer nonfatal strokes than aspirin or clopidogrel. Hospitalization for worsening heart failure occurred in 116 (22.2%), 97 (18.5%), and 89 (16.5%) patients treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin, respectively (P=0.02 for warfarin versus aspirin).
Related Article:
Circulation 2009 119: 1553-1555.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Ezekowitz, M. J. Koti, and B. Fulton Reducing Stroke Rates in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: How Low Can We Go? Circulation, September 29, 2009; 120(13): 1169 - 1170. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Konstam Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Failure: WATCHful Wondering Circulation, March 31, 2009; 119(12): 1559 - 1561. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Hess, W. McKenna, and H.-P. Schultheiss CHAPTER 18 Myocardial Disease ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |