Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:e97

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

(Circulation. 1999;100:e97.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulation Electronic Pages

Inflammatory Response in Unstable Angina

Arnon Blum, MD

From Cardiology Branch, NHLBI National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md


*    To the Editor:
 
I have read with interest the articleby Liuzzo et al1 and their interesting conclusion that "These findings ... suggest that the magnitude of the acute-phase response is determined to a greater extent by the individual responsiveness than by the type of provocative stimuli."

I would like to support this theory and to add our experience in this field. Recently, we2 published a study in which 55 patients with coronary artery disease were enrolled. We found that a high level (>100 µg/mL) of an inflammatory protein (serum amyloid type A; SAA) could identify patients with severe unstable angina with a high sensitivity and specificity (r=0.85 and 0.86, respectively). Of the patients studied, 75% experienced an increase in their SAA level 24 hours after angioplasty. An increase of SAA by >100% was associated with an increased risk of restenosis, with a relative risk of 6.4 (P<0.05). We found that there was no correlation between the inflammatory state before angioplasty (or the clinical severity) and the restenosis rate; rather, it was the SAA increase 24 hours after angioplasty that was associated with restenosis. Specifically, the SAA level increased dramatically after angioplasty, unrelated to preangioplasty SAA levels or the clinical state of the patient before the procedure.

I believe that "host traits" (genes? immuno-inflammatory mechanisms?) have an important role in the clinical outcome of every disease process, including coronary artery disease.


*    References
 
1. Liuzzo G, Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Caligiuri G, Vitelli A, Altamura S, Ciliberto G, Rebuzzi AG, Crea F, Pepys MB, Maseri A. Enhanced inflammatory response to coronary angioplasty in patients with severe unstable angina. Circulation. 1998;98:2370–2376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Blum A, Kaplan G, Vardinon N, Yust I, Burke M, Laniado S, Miller H. Serum amyloid type A may be a predictor of restenosis. Clin Cardiol. 1998;21:655–658.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]