Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:e106

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svedjeholm, R.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svedjeholm, R.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, D. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction

(Circulation. 1999;100:e106.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulation Electronic Pages

Optimal Dosage of Insulin and Glucose in Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Remains to Be Established

Rolf Svedjeholm, MD, PhD; Erik Håkanson, MD, PhD; Zoltan Szabo, MD

Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Linköping Heart Center, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden


*    Introduction
 
To the Editor:

The dosage of insulin and glucose plays an important role for the efficacy of GIK (glucose-insulin-potassium) treatment. Until the ECLA study, only 4 trials in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) had used the GIK therapy required to achieve adequate suppression of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs).1 Pooled data from these trials demonstrated a 48% reduction in mortality. In the ECLA study, a significant survival advantage relative to the control group was only found in the "high-dose GIK group."2 In spite of these encouraging results, we do not yet know the optimal dosage of insulin and glucose in AMI.

To establish appropriate metabolic interventions, these should preferably be evaluated in the relevant clinical settings. Surprisingly little is known about the metabolic consequences of myocardial infarction in humans or the impact of metabolic interventions in this setting. In stable coronary artery disease, an infusion of 30 g of glucose, 50 IU of regular insulin, and 80 mmol of KCl per liter at 1.5 mL/kg body weight reduced myocardial FFA uptake and myocardial oxygen demand, whereas the uptake of glucose and lactate increased.3 In AMI, it was demonstrated that this regimen reduced the level of plasma FFAs substantially.4 However, its impact on myocardial metabolism in this setting remains obscure. The neuroendocrine stress response, for instance, may be expected to influence myocardial metabolism and attenuate the effect of GIK due to insulin resistance. In coronary surgery, where systematic studies on GIK and its effects on systemic and myocardial metabolism have been done . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Rafael Díaz, , MD

Director of ECLA Estudios Cardiológicos Latinoamérica, Director, Cardiovascular Department, Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

Darren K. McGuire, MD

Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC