Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:e110

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mak, K.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Schömig, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mak, K.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Schömig, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 1999;100:e110.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulation Electronic Pages

Recovery of Coronary Flow and Left Ventricular Function After Abciximab

Koon-Hou Mak, MBBS

Department of Cardiology National Heart Centre, Tan Hospital, Singapore


*    Introduction
 
To the Editor:

I read with great interest the article by Neumann et al1 on the "Effect of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade on Recovery of Coronary Flow and Left Ventricular Function After the Placement of Coronary-Artery Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction." In particular, the recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function provided by abciximab were related to improvement of perfusion of the coronary microvasculature beyond mere restoration of epicardial vessel patency. Indeed, the efficacy of abciximab in preventing distal embolization and reducing periprocedural myocardial infarction was observed previously among various subsets of patients in the EPIC (Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications) trial.2 3

In the article by Neumann et al,1 patients with myocardial infarction were randomized to receiving standard-dose heparin or abciximab plus low-dose heparin. A total of 15 000 U was administered to those in the standard-heparin group compared with 30 000 U of heparin for those treated with abciximab plus low-dose heparin. In addition, patients in the standard-heparin group continued to receive heparin infusion for 12 hours after sheath removal. I suppose the total dose of heparin in the abciximab plus low-dose heparin group was 7500 U (typographical error in the text, I believe). Nonetheless, this dose is not particularly low, because the median dose among patients in the low-dose heparin group of the EPILOG (Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-term Outcome with abciximab GP IIb/IIIa blockade) study4 was 5500 U (interquartile range 4700 to 6600 U). On the other hand, the median doses . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Franz-Josef Neumann; MD Rudolf Blasini; MD Claus Schmitt; MD Eckhard Alt; MD Josef Dirschinger; MD Meinrad Gawaz; MD Adnan Kastrati; MD Albert Schömig, MD

Deutsches Herzzentrum and 1. Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
Y-J Yang, J-L Zhao, S-J You, Y-J Wu, Z-C Jing, W-X Yang, L Meng, Y-W Wang, and R-L Gao
Different effects of tirofiban and aspirin plus clopidogrel on myocardial no-reflow in a mini-swine model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion
Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1131 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]