(Circulation. 1999;100:e117.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche E Biommagini, Ospedale S. Camillo de Lellis, Chieti, Italy
| Introduction |
|---|
I read with interest the report of Iskandrian et al.1 The
authors described a case of improvement of perfusion in the right
coronary artery territories (after transmyocardial
revascularization), as well as in the territory of
the left anterior descending artery and the circumflex artery (after
CABG surgery). Id like to ask the authors why they were sure that the
improvement in the inferior territory was due to the laser.
Because they did not show the preoperative angiography of the patient,
we imagine that the right coronary artery was occluded and only
small vessels were present, with collateral circulation coming from
the other coronary branches, which were stenosed but patent. If
this is true, an improvement in the inferior territory
could be a result of the normalization of the flow in the other
coronary arteries, which also supply the inferior
territory. If the right coronary artery was not occluded but
the distal vessels were small (without any evidence of collateral
circulation from other coronary branches), why werent these
vessels grafted? Small-vessel disease is very well known, and its
treatment, even if technically demanding, is feasible by the
average surgeon. Moreover, the right coronary artery system was
not grafted "because of poor distal runoff." This doesnt seem to
be true, because the territory in that area was viable, as demonstrated
by the improvement in perfusion, whatever the cause. Basically, the
indication to the laser doesnt seem clear to me. In any case, mixing
surgery with the laser makes it
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |